Stub class. Good introduction but further, full development needed including analysis of the music, critical appreciation etc. also removal of trivia. --Kleinzach05:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Low Start class, as it does not fit the definition of Stub inWikipedia:Assessment. Further development per Kleinzach is certainly possible and necessary (and sources/references need to be added and the irrelevant external link removed). --GuillaumeTell16:15, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

19/80. Strong stub. A strong start on the background. Tackling one of the missing sections properly (e.g. the recordings) should get this comfortably to start class

• Background 9/15. There should be more info about composition history available
• Performance history 5/15 I would expect some indication of how often it is given by chamber ensmble, how often by orchestra with reference e.g. to programmes of major orchestras. First performance could mention involvmnet of people such as Richter. Some details in Cosima's diary.
• Critical opinion discussion of the music 4/15. Needs analysis of the music and further indication of what elements of the opera are influenced and any moves on the opposite direction.
• Recordings 0/10
• Illustrations 0/10 Plenty of choice of illustrations of Cosima, Tribschen or RW himself. Musical extracts could help.
• Referencing, sources, links etc 1/15. Not the most useful of links. Derivation of music needs a citation.--Peter cohen11:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]