| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theSex differences in human physiology article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1,2Auto-archiving period:12 months |
| Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this articlemay be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer toWikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content andoptions for not seeing an image. |
| This article was nominated fordeletion on11 August2005. The result ofthe discussion wasno consensus. |
| This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guidelineWikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typicallyreview articles. Here are links topossibly useful sources of information aboutSex differences in human physiology.
|
This is one of the most distinctive and obvious differences between male and female anatomy, and it is barely mentioned?Honestly, how can this be? It is a vital part on sexual dimorphism in our species and as a fellow user previously mentioned, humans are the only mammals with permanent breasts. Such a huge discussion around the reasons and consequences of this fact, goes by unnoticed?Impacts in societal relations (the possibility of cross-breastfeeding infants, for example, making it easier to feed them in case the mother is absent, and providing for a wider immunologic training), impacts in sexual division of labor (large breasts make some tasks and activities wildly more difficult), visual impacts in sexual recognition (you can tell a woman from very far away if the breasts are distinguishable, this is evolutionarily very relevant), impacts on health (breast cancer is predominantely female for example), the cultural impact of the large breasts imagery (think of the absurdity of Hooters: a business model based on large breasts), and so on and so on. Hell, it could be an article on its own, and it is absurd and shameful to brush off this subject as unimportant in this article.
When supinated the lower arms of Females have a greater deviation from the upper arm than do males. Presumably to avoid collision with wider hips when walking. Note sample photo.122.107.197.131 (talk)23:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the recent changes to the lung and heart info since the information was unclear and contradictory. Every time a difference statistic is presented, it needs to be clear whether the difference is a controlled difference or an uncontrolled difference. Also using "at least" rather than "on average" is factually incorrect. Also use of "even if" and "even when" needlessly introduces ambiguity to the sentences. Just state the statistics plainly and clearly. Finally, two of the sentences about heart differences contradicted each other. One stated that the average difference was 25% "even if males and females are of the same height and size", and the other stated that the average difference was 31%. Finally, it is extremely dubious that the difference would be the same regardless of height and size being controlled. There should be two different figures, one controlled, the other not controlled.Nosferattus (talk)16:09, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr.Lewinsky 2: Once again I have reverted changes where controlled and uncontrolled differences are being conflated, this time in relation to muscle strength. If you are citing specific numerical differences, you need to specify whether those differences are controlled or absolute and if they are controlled, what specific variables are being controlled. Using phrasing like "even when controlled" in relation to specific figures is confusing and misleading. You can say that something is greater in men or women "even when controlled", but if you are citing a specific figure, you have to state what that figure is in relation too. It looks like there are a lot of examples of this problem in the article. Does what I'm saying make sense?Nosferattus (talk)20:24, 4 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)07:36, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]