Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Sema v. COMELEC and Dilangalen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconTambayan PhilippinesMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to thePhilippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconLawLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for thelegal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

I created this article, since this is the first Philippine jurisprudence, since 1901, June 12, which annulled an entire Province, despite the huge amount spent for referendum. The aftermath, is total legal uncertainty and displacement for officials and employees.--Florentino floro (talk)11:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image, template -Kennedy v. Louisiana

[edit]

I added this simple template, since I do not know how to make the very beautiful template of USA decisions. Note that thisSema v. Comelec is the only and first Wikipedia Philippine decision article. So, like in the USA Wiki decision articles likeKennedy v. Louisiana, we must have a template asUser:Anyo Niminus made for others.Subic rape case, is not a decision but just another article. I also added the image but small, since, I just copied the USA format and I used the same image already displayed inSupreme Court of the Philippines. Please make a better one like Kennedy orBaze v. Rees--Florentino floro (talk)09:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Supremes.png

[edit]

The imageImage:Supremes.png is used in this article under a claim offair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets therequirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have anexplanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is anon-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice byFairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, seeWikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sema_v._COMELEC_and_Dilangalen&oldid=1204378776"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp