Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Seaborgium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlesSeaborgium has been listed as one of theNatural sciences good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it.
Review: February 20, 2017. (Reviewed version).
This level-5 vital article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconElementsMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported byWikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to thechemical elements and theirisotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit theproject page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theimportance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited StatesMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRussia:Technology & engineering /Science & educationMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Russia, aWikiProject dedicated to coverage ofRussia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at theproject page, or contribute to theproject discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe technology and engineering in Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe science and education in Russia task force.

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1


This page has archives. Sections older than730 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

The "pre-discovery" of 1970

[edit]

When I expand this article further (FA, anyone?) I should write about that: element 106 was first observed at Berkeley in 1970 but was not recognised as such (see the chapter on Sg ofThe Transuranium People).Double sharp (talk)14:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make an FA out of this, I'd be willing to help. That information is definitely something to start with.ComplexRational (talk)19:40, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Double sharp: I wrote a small bit about this pre-discovery. If we would like to make this an FA, what must be done?ComplexRational (talk)00:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ComplexRational: Probably some more, to be honest. I'm not very happy with how this article currently is (even though I mostly wrote it): too many quotes. I thinkhassium andnihonium are probably the best models. :)Double sharp (talk)02:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Search for natural Sg

[edit]

New article.Double sharp (talk)10:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Double sharp: Interesting find! It also nicely summarizes other claims about naturally-occurring SHEs.Complex/Rational12:27, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I should add this...Double sharp (talk)19:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oxidation states

[edit]
  • [Sg(H
    2
    O)
    6
    ]6+
    converts to ions with less water and less positive ions.
  • The only known oxidation states (as of 2023, according to the article) are +6 and 0.
  • [Sg(OH)
    3
    (H
    2
    O)
    2
    ]+
    has Sg in oxidation state of +4.

Is the single positive charge a mistake, or did the Sg oxidation state of 4 actually appear?Alfa-ketosav (talk)08:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The mistake was that an O was accidentally omitted, which I have now corrected to[SgO(OH)
3
(H
2
O)
2
]+
. Good catch.Complex/Rational16:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Seaborgium&oldid=1192321810"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp