Talk:Seaborgium
Page contents not supported in other languages.
![]() | Seaborgium has been listed as one of theNatural sciences good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it. Review: February 20, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This![]() It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
This page has archives. Sections older than730 days may be automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
When I expand this article further (FA, anyone?) I should write about that: element 106 was first observed at Berkeley in 1970 but was not recognised as such (see the chapter on Sg ofThe Transuranium People).Double sharp (talk)14:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
New article.Double sharp (talk)10:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is the single positive charge a mistake, or did the Sg oxidation state of 4 actually appear?Alfa-ketosav (talk)08:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]