| This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article was nominated fordeletion onFebruary 18,2007. The result ofthe discussion waskeep. |
Have you already heard aboutthis? Do you think that in that article can be written anything about it?D T G19:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is true that theAromanian Wikipedia has never got anywhere. Despite the insistence of the people who wanted it set up that it was going to be a proper Wikipedia, they have created not even fifty pages in two years of existence.
Romanian wikipedia = stubpedia, 10 random article ---> 8 stub, like this: "Melissia este un oraş în Grecia.". Useless, ridiculous. It's a fact, why delete?
Actually, Romanian Wikipedia is now in 21st position, but it could easily get to 19th. It could also do a lot worse, so maybe we should say it "struggles to be in the first 20" or something... --Venatoreng08:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]