Roger Waters is aformer featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, checkthe nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).
Articles
Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofEast Anglia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theUnited Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsocialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of yourcommon.css page:
.ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
You are not anextended-confirmed user, soyou must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make anedit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs,RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You must be logged-in andextended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except formaking edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except inlimited circumstances)
@GidiD: The content you re-added was clearly challenged, so why did you do that? This is a BLP and an Israeli source is suboptimal for misleading claims which are also undue to lede.Makeandtoss (talk)11:09, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Makeandtoss: Well, Haaretz is indeed an Israeli newspaper, but it is still a reliable one, frequently criticizing Israeli policy. But you have also other sources, e.g. The Algemeiner.
Most importantly Roger Waters declares, in his own voice, that there is no evidence for rape of women on 7 October: "No they weren't [raped] ...There was no evidence. You can say anything that you want, but there is no evidence.”here 35:01. As he himself denies that rapes were committed on Oct 7th - this cannot be considered a "misleading" claim, BLP or no BLP.GidiD (talk)13:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GidiD: Sexual violence includes many things other than rape, he specifically refuted the occurrence of rape, which Patten’s UN report also said it was unsubstantiated; therefore this is not a controversial claim. I did not question reliability of Haaretz, I just pointed out to the conflict of interest being an Israeli source (we all heard of the Israeli government pressure on Haaretz not to publish reports of its intimidation campaign against the ICC prosecutor, to cite one example). Algemeiner is not a reliable source per WP.Makeandtoss (talk)13:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Makeandtoss. Section 12 of the UN mission report clearly states {{xt|"there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred during the 7 October attacks in multiple locations across Gaza periphery, includingrape and gang rape, in at least three locations"}}.
Indeed there is a great deal of evidence for rapes, including testimonies of survivors, forensic evidence, confessions of Hamas militants and many more, reported in RS - I would not repeat the citation in the article's body. Waters says on the interview more than once thatthere isno evidence - citing this is not a misleading claim.GidiD (talk)14:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GidiD: "reasonable grounds to believe" and "The absence of comprehensive forensic evidence limited the mission team’s ability to draw definitive forensic conclusions in many instances." Not my point anyway, my point is his remarks could be interpreted in a number of ways, the most controversial of which shouldn't be linked to a non-independent source with a vested interest in the topic, and certainly not in the lede as a highlight of his 80 year existence.Makeandtoss (talk)14:45, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Haaretz is an independent source with no vested interest in the topic. I see you are repeating this claim in multiple articles, wherever Israeli newspapers are concerned - As I have suggested elsewhere, you should take this baseless claim toWP:RSN, where some experienced editor will set you straightKentucky Rain24 (talk)16:23, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Makeandtoss: I would accept your suggestion not to put it in the lede. But the interview with Piers Morgan should certainly be included in the body for the following reasons:
The interview isvery relevant to the section about his political viewpoints.
It gained considerable attention in the media and in social media networks.
The interview is well documented.
Waters did claim there is no evidence that rapes were committed;
@Makeandtoss: No need to include the "considerable attention" in the text.
Just between us, as editors, there was a dramatic increase (around 5 fold) in Google searches of "Roger Waters" at the day of the interview. Hence not a marginal interview.GidiD (talk)08:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.
Change “Gaza Genocide” to “Gaza Conflict” as it is not proven to be a genocide. Various attempts were made to preserve human life via warnings made by the IDF for the evacuation of areas to be targeted for the removal of Hamas who initiated and instigated the conflict while holding Israeli hostages in Gaza within the areas targeted by the IDF. This alone is enough to make invalid the opinion that Gaza’s population is facing direct intent by the IDF to commit genocide. I feel the original wording is bias and not factual regarding the situation in Gaza. It is a conflict not a genocide.[1]~2026-56638-1 (talk)14:02, 26 January 2026 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Waters[reply]
level-5 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
Not done: "Gaza genocide" is the title of the Wikipedia article on the subject.Day Creature (talk)16:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
