This article was nominated fordeletion on 16 February 2020. The result ofthe discussion waskeep.

This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

AppsLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofapps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. Contribute to the project: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Good article nominations : ImproveApplication software,Facebook andInstagram togood article status Stubs :Category:Mobile game stubs,Category:Stub-Class apps articles

I put the banner up there because Engadget, Google Play, Instagram, and YouTube (especially if it's the companies YouTube channel) are not reliable sources. Especially for what they are being cited for, but they wouldn't be reliable sources anyway. Hiddenstranger decided to edit war me over it though. So, I'd like other opinions. As even though those sources are pretty clearly seen as negative overall in Wikipedia (especially when primary), the user isn't willing to accept the general consensus about their lack of reliability in this case for some reason. --Adamant1 (talk)08:52, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I concur withAdamant1. This page has a significant advert problem.Dorama285 (talk)19:50, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hiddenstranger: --Adamant1 (talk)05:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see what cultural impact this application has had. As the "cultural impact" section is just a list of mentions in various media. Many of which are not experts in the fitness app space, let alone reputable sources who's mere mention of the app automatically qualify it as culturally significant. To make it's "cultural impact" more un-substantiated and vague, the user who originally added the section claims the app has cultural impact simply because "cultural impact is a thing." Which isn't good enough IMO. Claiming it has cultural impact just because when it doesn't clearly goes againstWP:NPOV. Just getting rid of the phrasing would undoubtedly lead to edit warring though. Since that is what the user is currently doing with other edits they don't agree with. So, I'd like outside opinions. --Adamant1 (talk)09:05, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• WikiProject Apps
• Start-Class apps articles
• Low-importance apps articles
• WikiProject Apps articles