This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Film:Filmmaking /American This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you canjoin the discussion and see lists ofopen tasks andregional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation. To improve this article, please refer to theguidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by theFilmmaking task force. This article is supported by theAmerican cinema task force. CaliforniaLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. CompaniesLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcompanies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests :Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess :Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit :Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox :Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain :Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located atCategory:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the{{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the{{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answerrequests for comments

To me, this whole article feels like an advertisement.

There's no mention of RM's (supposed) attempts to force MGM into Bankruptcy

To quote the MGM page... "There was some indication that Relativity Media and its financial backer, Elliott Associates (a hedge fund based in New York), had been acquiring MGM debt in an attempt to force the company into involuntary bankruptcy."

(The only working reference for that paragraph ishttp://nypost.com/2009/04/03/relativity-kills-deal-with-mgm/ )

I have no idea if this is true but if it's worth mentioning on the MGM page, I'd argue a sentence or two here would be justified.

I'm also a little concerned over how many of the edits seem to be made by RM employees...

I'd appreciate input from others on the best way to proceed217.37.166.142 (talk)11:01, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article had a list that was indiscriminate in nature by listing every relationship the company has had. There is no indication of the true degree of involvement, and the list has been subject to vandalism by sockpuppets of banned editors.Erik (talk |contribs)20:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Greg Longstreet. I am the Interim VP of Corporate Communications at Relativity Media. On 7/12/12 I deleted a section of our company profile that was added without our consent that did not accurately reflect our company (Financial Troubles and Executive Turnover). The comments in this paragraph are false. You’ll notice in 2011, Relativity had huge hits in Immortals^[1] and Limitless^[2] . You will also notice that films that we helped co-finance, like the movie Paul, proved to be solid performers as well^[3]. Also, Warrior’s Way, which is mentioned was included in the paragraph's 2011 claims, was released had most of its run in 2010^[4]. Additionally, executive turnover should not be viewed in a negative light as it is simply speculation by news outlets^[5]. We'd ask that you delete this paragraph, as it is not a truthful account of the company's history.209.66.115.190 (talk)00:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC) 7/13/12[reply]

• Dear Greg: there are a few misunderstandings here. This isnot your "company profile", but an encyclopedic article about the company. And your consent is not needed for anything written here, as nobody"owns" an article here. As you have a clearconflict of interest here, you should not edit the article yourself. If there are inaccuracies in the article, you can point them out here (as you did above) and then somebody else will make the necessary changes. Unfortunately, "speculation by news outlets" is something that can be included in the article, as it is not up to us to decide what is speculation and what is not. --Guillaume2303 (talk)08:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I know my this is a little late but user Guillaume2303 is most certainly correct. Sorry Greg, but no one needs your consent to write an article on Wikipedia. As long as there are valid ,reputable sources for the claims, anything can be written,even if it portrays your company in a negative light.--BeckiGreen (talk)22:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am a representative on behalf of Relativity Media. We discovered that someone has added the movie 10 Year to our production slate. You'll see in the link that we have no involvement in this project.^[1]

Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

RelativityREAL has since been rebranded as Relativity Television. Can you please change the name wherever mentioned?

ThatsFeffedUp (talk)17:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: as you have not citedreliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added, or changed in any article. -Arjayay (talk)17:36, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was checking the sources cited in the "Businesses" section and with almost no exception, the claims in the article were completely missing or almost entirely unsubstantiated by the sources. Many of the sources were unreliable. Much was cited fromIMDB, and the tone and claims were highlypromotional in nature. If the material is deemed worthy of inclusion, it should only be reinstated with references of high quality, in my opinion.Popoki35 (talk)11:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class film articles
• Start-Class filmmaking articles
• Filmmaking task force articles
• Start-Class American cinema articles
• American cinema task force articles
• WikiProject Film articles
• Start-Class California articles
• Low-importance California articles
• WikiProject California articles
• Start-Class company articles
• Low-importance company articles
• WikiProject Companies articles