![]() | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article iswritten inHong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,realise,travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
Could a specialist add the filming location?olivier 04:06 Dec 2, 2002 (UTC)
the pinyin seems to be wrong on my rendering engine, not complying with unicode. --Abdull12:02, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
China stopped being feudal when the Qing fell in 1911, so the era bit here is wrong.
China stopped being Feudal with Qin Shihuangdi, long before Europe even thought of feudalism. The use of feudal for imperial China is a side-effect of marxist philosophy claiming that everything pre-revolution is feudal.
Shim-pua_marriage <--- Is this the marriage arrangement that the film used?
Well, hello! I think I've done quite a bit for this article now. I've added and changed quite a bit. All the current citations are my work, I hope they're OK [I'd never added a citation before today!]. I've added a new 'reception' section, added to the film infobox, fiddled/changed/edited the intro and added to the external links. I also got rid of what I thought was a POV comment somewhere, I'll leave you to check the history if you're interested. I may well add a 'Distribution' section soon as I think I've got some good info on that. Please tell me if anything was wrong/good/bad or whatever. Comments would be great!SIGURD4217:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The plot part is basically right, but only if you take everything the movie's charactersclaim for a fact. I have the feeling the director wanted that to be open to interpretation.
I think this ambiguity is a great plot device and essential for understanding the film.92.230.15.131 (talk)22:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A thread in IMDb has a lot of Chinese witnesses who vouched that the film was never banned in China, and a number of them saw it in 1991.121.7.189.234 (talk)13:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Simon (talk)11:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onRaise the Red Lantern. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)00:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]