Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Pythagoras

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to thePythagoras article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1,2,3Auto-archiving period:12 months 
Good articlePythagoras has been listed as one of thePhilosophy and religion good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 2, 2018Good article nomineeListed
September 13, 2018Peer reviewReviewed
September 23, 2018Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia'sMain Page in the"Did you know?" column onMarch 18, 2018.
The text of the entry was:Did you know ... that Greek legends claimPythagoras(pictured) had a golden thigh, could fly thanks to a magic arrow, was greeted by name by a river, and when bitten by a snake, bit it back and killed it?
Current status:Good article
This level-4 vital article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects.
WikiProject iconClassical Greece and RomeTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see ourproject page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see ourtalk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconReligionTop‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles onReligion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help usassess and improve articles togood and1.0 standards, or visit thewikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
TopThis article has been rated asTop-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMathematicsTop‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofmathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
TopThis article has been rated asTop-priority on theproject's priority scale.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy:Philosophers /Metaphysics /Logic /AncientHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related tophilosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join thegeneral discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophers
Taskforce icon
Metaphysics
Taskforce icon
Logic
Taskforce icon
Ancient philosophy
WikiProject iconBiography:Science and Academia /Core
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe science and academia work group (assessed asTop-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is listed on the project'score biographies page.
WikiProject iconAstronomyMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related toAstronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconGreeceMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofGreece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreece
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhysics:BiographiesMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPhysics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
This article is supported byBiographies Taskforce.
WikiProject iconVeganism and VegetarianismMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofveganism andvegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2023

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Evidence has revealed Pythagoras's Journal in Rome with a body holding it.204.8.62.75 (talk)

 Not done: please providereliable sources that support the change you want to be made.HouseBlastertalk22:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wow...I can't even find any UNRELIABLE sources for this "journal in Rome", even among the usual suspects for propagating this kind of junk.--ElectroNautical (talk)16:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fast Tracking a Good Article reassessment?

[edit]

Sorry folks,I KNOW I am supposed to add new topics at the bottom, but (a) there arevery serious problems starting in the lead, (b) this article is too important to leave these kind of errors unaddressed and (c) I simply don't have time toprioritize improving the article before requesting reassessment.

I'm hoping to solicit help from previous editors or those with interest and experience making this article more encyclopedic.

Among the biggest problems I see in the lead, one un-sourced assertion that stands out is...

"..many of the accomplishments credited to himlikely originated earlier or were made by his colleagues or successors.Some accounts mention that the philosophy associated with Pythagoras was related to mathematics and that numbers were important, but it is debated to what extent,if at all, he actually contributed to mathematics or natural philosophy."

This kind of 'bold statement' (opinionated summary of various opinions) in the lead needs extraordinary proof referenced immediately following with specific examples. Seemingly everyone agrees (including the experts themselves) that almost everything about his life is mere speculation based on apocryphal legends.

The lead should me MUCH shorter, focus on 'little is actually known' and make sure that controversial references to unproven and unprovable stuff like 'aspects of vegetarianism' ?!?!? are moved elsewhere. Writing style and dialectics are also big problems. Vegetarianism is by definition a binary thing -- either you eat ONLY from the plant kingdom or you don't. We are leading readers to the conclusion that not only was Pythagoras preaching about the ethics of eating animal protein, he was also a hypocrite in choosing the 'aspects' of vegetarianism he liked.

I'm going to take a stab at some more-than-minor edits I HOPE will be non-controversial, but well aware that multiple editors here must have shared the PoV's that led to acceptance of the lead as it is.

As I find it, this article gives WP:UNDUE weight to speculations about the silliest and most controversial of these apocryphal tales and could be summed up with a "He was a whack-job", which segues nicely to...'smoke trapping'ElectroNautical (talk)15:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well...I just realized the article is protected. I hope someone can help. If it cannot be unprotected, what are the options? I don't want to resort to requesting reassessment, but the recommendation to "prioritize improving" is not available to me. Thoughts?ElectroNautical (talk)16:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"needs extraordinary proof referenced immediately" – This is an entirely uncontroversial claim, widely accepted among scholars, with nothing particularly "bold" about it. Discussion of this point is well sourced in the relevant section of the article, and doesn't need a footnote parade redundantly pasted into the lead section. –jacobolus (t)16:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What jacobolus said.XOR'easter (talk)15:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2024

[edit]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request.

Please add the following item to «MODERN SECONDARY SOURCES» :● WISER, Jean-François (2024)Pythagoras' Archives - A Sum of Pythagoreanism / ISBN-13 : 978-2322525287PYTHAGORE46 (talk)20:55, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is apparently a self-published book. It's not cited in the article, so it doesn't belong under "Modern secondary sources" in the "References" section. I doubt that it would be suitable even in the "Further reading" section.Deor (talk)21:38, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This seems like a self-published book by an amateur without professional experience in the subject? –jacobolus (t)21:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: Not a reliable source per above.'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs)00:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is indeed a «self-published book» written by an «amateur». But «professionals» certainly don't have the privilege of knowledge. Wouldn't you read a bit of it (see AMAZON or GOOGLE BOOKS samples) before dismissing ? Thank you. J-F.WISERPYTHAGORE46 (talk)11:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
SeeWP:reliable source𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk)13:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very occasionally self-published books by amateurs can be used as sources in Wikipedia, but generally that only happens when the work is widely cited by experts in the field, which doesn't happen immediately after publication.
Absent strong countervailing evidence, self-published works are not considered to be "reliable sources" by Wikipedia. This policy is not intended to reflect on the merits of any particular work; it just simplifies the messy process of managing an encyclopedia written by pseudonymous volunteer editors. –jacobolus (t)14:59, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt text

[edit]

I had removed the alt text from many of the images from this page as they conflict withaccessibility guidelines by being overly long and describing the picture in minute details. I've reverted this removal now that concerns have been raised on my talk page.Here is a diff of the changes. In each of these four cases, I believe that the image caption itself already meets the accessibility guidelines. @JMF - do you have any concerns with these captions meeting the linked accessibility guidelines? Are they in conflict with any other existing wikimedia accessibility guidelines you're aware of?Psychastes (talk)16:04, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

looks like the official guideline isMOS:ALT, which seems broadly in parity with the guidelines i linkedPsychastes (talk)16:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The mos:alt seems to apply to a description of a picture as a picture, in which case brevity is appropriate. If the image is to illustrate something, then the alt text needs to communicate the same information textually. Most of the images were just decorative and you were right to delete them.
Your edit summary said that you had deleted over-length alt texts: I just wanted to alert you to their significance. I have a poor mobile connection at the moment, so wasn't able to check for myself if there is actually any issue. I am happy to accept your opinion that there is none.𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk)17:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pythagoras

[edit]

He was born in 490 BC2600:4040:AEF9:D200:CFF4:13A9:376F:8B8E (talk)20:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pythagoras&oldid=1319714626"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp