Talk:Property crime
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This level-5 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
There is a couple of problems with these unsourced statements. First, the comment about robbery assumes a violent crime and a property crime are mutually exclusive, which is not the case logically, nor legally. My general understanding of robbery for U.S. jurisdictions is that robbery is a Crime (or Offense) Against Property. See Sections 708-840 through 708-842 of theHawaii Revised Statues, constituting the degrees and definitions of robbery for that State. Chapter 708, which those sections fall under, is titled Crimes Against Property. Also, article 222 of theModel Penal Code falls under the category of "Offenses Against Property". I recognize some jurisdictions may include Robbery under Crimes Against Persons, see sections 211-215 of theCalifornia Penal Code under Title 8m Crimes against the Person. No citations for this right now, but think of it this way. Thepurpose of robbery is to obtain, that is, steal, property. The use of force is themeans to realize that purpose. While the means aggravates the offense to something more serious than theft, it does not remove it from the rubric of an offense against property or a property crime.
Thus, I propose changing the sentence to acknowledge that, while Robbery is a property crime (at least in some jurisdictions), it is also a violent crime as well.
Second, the second sentence in the quoted material is off for a few reasons. 1) I'm pretty sure no state in the USA requires a building to be uninhabited for a burglary charged. If inhabitation is a factor at all, it's usually an aggravating factor make the penalty higher. 2) the sentence implies that burglary does not involve threat or force at all. Burglary is, generally speaking, entering/remaining unlawfully within a structure (what qualifies may vary between jurisdictions) with the intent to commit a crime therein. Now what sorts of crimes may be limited. in the burglary sections in Chapter 708 of theHawaii Revised Statutes, a burg follows the preceding definition, but limits it to crimes against person or property. So, in Hawaii, entering a house without permission with the intent to commit assault (Hawaii's form ofBattery (crime)), terroristic threatening (similar toAssault as it exists in England),Sexual Assault, etc. Section 459 of theCalifornia Penal Code limits burglary to entering with intent to commitlarceny or a felony. Now, there are certainly crimes in any jurisdictions that would be a higher level offense than burglary, and the State would then prosecute the underlying crime, instead of burglary, but the fact is that burglary is not limited to property crimes.
For this I propose a statement to the effect that while burglary is a property crime because it involves trespass, depending on the jurisdiction it can involve the intent to commit other kinds of crime as well.
There was a problem that Extortion and Robbery were included in the examples in the article but in the opening the article incorrectly stated that property crimes could not involve the threat of force, but given those two examples they can be.— Precedingunsigned comment added byUpeer (talk •contribs)19:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These are things I can point out right now. I’m a little surprised this article has a B rating.InMyHumbleOpinion (talk)06:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dead source link:
^ Weatherburn, Don, Peter Grabosky (March 1997). "Strategic Approaches to Property Crime Control". Second National Outlook Symposium: Violent Crime, Property Crime and Public Policy, Canberra, Australia.http://www.aic.gov.au/conferences/outlook97/weather.pdf.—Precedingunsigned comment added by76.85.196.138 (talk)15:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onProperty crime. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online06:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onProperty crime. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online15:16, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
