Talk:Prescription monitoring program
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedList-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content fromNarxCare was copied or moved intoPrescription monitoring program. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Great article so far! The background on why PMPs are important was particularly useful to the reader. One thing that I think could be added for further clarity is a section on the different schedule classes of drugs. I think that adding this could ensure that the reader understands the chart. Great job verifying such broad data!— Precedingunsigned comment added bySgbroberg (talk •contribs)01:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The History section of this article isn't written in an encyclopedic tone. Immediately, I see:
There are other problems, like the alphabet soup of acronyms, and the weasel words ("many doctors... essential"), but the tone sticks out to me the most.— Precedingunsigned comment added by174.94.46.227 (talk)14:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest to mergeNarxCare into this arcticle.Geysirhead (talk)14:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
