Talk:Pe̍h-ōe-jī
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Pe̍h-ōe-jī table was nominated fordeletion.The discussion was closed on23 June 2014 with a consensus tomerge. Its contents weremerged intoPe̍h-ōe-jī. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please seeits history; for its talk page, seehere. |
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to thePe̍h-ōe-jī article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives (index):1Auto-archiving period:3 months  |
 | Pe̍h-ōe-jī has been listed as one of theLanguage and literature good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so.If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status:Good article | ||||||||||||||||
| This article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content fromthis version ofUser:Taiwantaffy/POJ was copied or moved intoPe̍h-ōe-jī withthis edit. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
There are local dialects that are not non-Mandarin. --2.245.168.36 (talk)21:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onPe̍h-ōe-jī. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag tohttp://iug.csie.dahan.edu.tw/iug/ungian/Soannteng/subok/poj.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)11:03, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)20:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The article contains the phrase:
"the nucleus vowel is the only required part of a licit consonant in Chinese varieties."
with a reference to a source. Since I cannot consult the source but seriously doubt that "consonant" is the intended word here (I am not aware that a vowel can be part of a consonant), I wonder if anyone can confirm that the word "syllable" is intended, or is the correct word.Redav (talk)16:17, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As written here in thePOJ#Han-Romanization mixed script section, "the termHàn-lô does not describe one specific system, but covers any kind of writing in Southern Min which features both Chinese characters and romanization."
I propose (a) copying the explanation of Han-lo here to theWritten Hokkien#Chinese characters section as a new heading/subheading, and
(b) changing theHàn-lô redirect to that new section there.
In my opinion, this is more inclusive of the topic and reflects the history and future of different authors using different romanization schemes.cboss2 (talk)04:14, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]