This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Caves This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Caves, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcaving andcave articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CavesWikipedia:WikiProject CavesTemplate:WikiProject CavesCaves ??? This article has not yet received a rating on theimportance scale. ArchaeologyLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofArchaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

The date "BP" is unscientific, because it does not tell wether BP is either an uncalibrated radiocarbon date (which, calibrated by CalPal, would correspond to c. 30,500 ± 500 BC, or simply before present and then correspond to 26,000 BC, which must not simply be conceiled!HJJHolm (talk)10:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, "28,000 BP (before present)," is nothing. Is it to be raw/uncalibrated 14C before 1950? Should it be calBP = cal before 1950? Or is it popular before today? Or roughly bevore 2000 AD??HJJHolm (talk)12:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The noted Paglicci 33 does not exist. I corrected it to Paglicci 133, beside some stylistic points. The Caramelli results were not confirme in Fu (2016).HJHolm (talk)07:47, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class Caves articles
• Unknown-importance Caves articles
• WikiProject Caves articles
• Start-Class Archaeology articles
• Low-importance Archaeology articles