Talk:Ottoman Iraq
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Ottoman Iraq is currently a World historygood article nominee.Nominated byThegiantofgiants (talk) at 18:52, 10 August 2025 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with thegood article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, clickdiscuss review and edit the page. Short description: 1534–1920 Ottoman rule of Iraq |
 | Ottoman Iraq (final version) received apeer review by Wikipedia editors, which was[[Wikipedia:Peer review/OttomanIraq/archive1|archived]] on 10 August 2025. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 | This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | Thispeer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I want feedback before nominating it for Good Article status. In particular, I’d like comments on sourcing precision and consistency, neutral tone, and terminology standardization, as well as on prose clarity.Thanks,Thegiantofgiants (talk)22:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Thegiantofgiants: Comments after a quick skim:
Other than that, I don't have any concerns. This can probably go toWP:GAN once the citation concerns are fixed.Z1720 (talk)05:30, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Nominator:Thegiantofgiants (talk ·contribs)18:52, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Reviewer:FenrisAureus (talk·contribs)06:00, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow traveller! I will be reviewing this nomination over the course of the next few days. If you have time, please consider reviewing an article atWP:GAN.—FenrisAureus▲(she/they) (talk)06:00, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Last updated: 06:09, 1 October 2025 (UTC) by ChristieBot
Seewhat the criteria are andwhat they are not
1a) the prose is clear, concise, andunderstandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct 1b) it complies with theManual of Style guidelines forlead sections,layout,words to watch,fiction, andlist incorporation 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance withthe layout style guideline 2b)reliable sources arecited inline. All content thatcould reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose) 2c) it containsno original research| Reference # | Citation |  Y/ N | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | — | 2a) | — |
| 2b) | — | ||
| 2c) | — | ||
| 18 | — | 2a) | — |
| 2b) | — | ||
| 2c) | — | ||
| 34 | — | 2a) | — |
| 2b) | — | ||
| 2c) | — | ||
| 50 | — | 2a) | — |
| 2b) | — | ||
| 2c) | — | ||
| 15 | — | 2a) | — |
| 2b) | — | ||
| 2c) | — |
2d) it contains nocopyright violations orplagiarism 3a) it addresses themain aspects of the topic 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (seesummary style) 4)Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5)Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoingedit war or content dispute 6a) media aretagged with theircopyright statuses, andvalid non-free use rationales are provided fornon-free content
6b) media arerelevant to the topic, and havesuitable captions
.svg)