This article was nominated fordeletion on 16 June 2023. The result ofthe discussion waskeep.

This article is ratedStub-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

ComputingLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcomputers,computing, andinformation technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

you won't allow primary sources on the main libreboot article, but you'll allow lb.at link with only primary source to this article.

conflict of interest suspected!

looking at you, @Yae492.40.218.255 (talk)03:47, 1 June 2023 (UTC)—92.40.218.255 (talk) has madefew or no other edits outside this topic.[reply]

Primary sources may be used when they meet criteria. SeeWP:PRIMARY. --Yae4 (talk)03:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hah!

there is even a Phoronix article.

Phoronix articles are banned as references in the Libreboot article, so why are they permitted *here* in this article?— Precedingunsigned comment added by92.40.218.255 (talk)04:37, 1 June 2023 (UTC)—92.40.218.255 (talk) has madefew or no other edits outside this topic.[reply]

Note the nuance here: Phoronix articles are not a reliable source, but the "further reading" section articles to not have to meet theWP:RS requirement but can be added if we think they are useful.PhotographyEdits (talk)07:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Phoronix is not banned, and is cited in hundreds (?) of articles.[1] --Yae4 (talk)15:11, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Include Libreboot.at?

1. Support

2. Oppose

PhotographyEdits (talk)11:40, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose since the project is hosted by the FSF/GNU people and LibrePlanet is an FSF event, this source is not independent. I think it should therefor not be included in this article, until some independent sourced is published. Until that point, I think there is aWP:DUE weight issue.PhotographyEdits (talk)11:40, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: It is premature to discuss this issue, again, until deletion or merge ofLibreboot.org is settled. Suggestion: ReviewWP:PRIMARY and scroll down toWP:SECONDARY. See "Secondary sources are not necessarily independent sources" and the rest. As forWP:DUE,something has to be expanded first or this is not going to be much of an article, and so far it is only a brief mention of existence of Libreboot.at. --Yae4 (talk)15:30, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Stub-Class Computing articles
• Low-importance Computing articles
• All Computing articles