Talk:Okonomiyaki
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Okonomiyaki has been listed as one of theAgriculture, food and drink good articles under thegood article criteria. If you can improve it further,please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you canreassess it. Review: September 3, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
| This level-5 vital article is ratedGA-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives |
| 1 |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at thenomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk)19:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello all!
This article has been chosen as this week's effort forWP:Discord's#team-b-vital channel, a collaborate effort to bring Stub and Start class Vital articles up to a B class if possible, similar toWP:Articles for Improvement. This effort will run for up to seven days, ending early if the article is felt to be at B-class or impossible to further improve. Articles are chosen by a quick vote among interested chatters, with the goal of working together on interesting Vital articles that need improving. This is the fourth article chosen and the final trial run for the effort.
Thank you! --ferret (talk)16:08, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Reviewer:PinkElixir (talk·contribs)20:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'll be taking on this review. Kind regards,PinkElixir (talk)20:41, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1.Well-written: | ||
 | 1a. the prose is clear, concise, andunderstandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | The prose is clear and concise. I made some minor grammar edits as I was reading through. |
| 1b. it complies with theManual of Style guidelines forlead sections,layout,words to watch,fiction, andlist incorporation. | The lead section appropriately summarizes the rest of the article. I might suggest adding some history to the Lead section to strengthen it even further. |
| 2.Verifiable withno original research: | ||
| 2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance withthe layout style guideline. | All information is properly sourced. Great job finding such a wide array of sources! The references follow MOS:REFERENCES. |
| 2b.reliable sources arecited inline. All content thatcould reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All content is appropriately sourced using appropriate WP:RS. |
| 2c. it containsno original research. | There is no WP:OR. |
| 2d. it contains nocopyright violations orplagiarism. | There are no signs of WP:PLAG or WP:CV. |
| 3.Broad in its coverage: | ||
| 3a. it addresses themain aspects of the topic. | The article focuses on relevant main aspects of the topic, including the dish's history and its variations across Japan. I might suggest adding a "preparation" section to outline how the dish is made. Many food articles on Wikipedia have such a section. |
| 3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (seesummary style). | The article stays focused without adding unnecessary detail. |
| 4.Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | The article follows NPOV. |
| 5.Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoingedit war or content dispute. | There is no history of edit warring or content dispute on the article. On the contrary, the talk page discussion highlights great collaboration amongst multiple editors to improve the quality of this article. |
| 6.Illustrated, if possible, bymedia such asimages,video, oraudio: | ||
| 6a. media aretagged with theircopyright statuses, andvalid non-free use rationales are provided fornon-free content. | All images fall under the appropriate CC license or are editors' own work. |
| 6b. media arerelevant to the topic, and havesuitable captions. | Photographs used are relevant to the topic. Given the size of the article, perhaps 1 or 2 images can be removed without diminishing the article's quality. |
 | 7.Overall assessment. | Y - this article passes GAN review! Please see my specific comments for some suggestions on further improvement. Otherwise, this is a solid article with valuable information, accurate sources. Great work!
|
