This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Film:British This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you canjoin the discussion and see lists ofopen tasks andregional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation. To improve this article, please refer to theguidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by theBritish cinema task force.

Image:O Lucky Man!.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used underfair use but there is noexplanation or rationale as to why its use inthis Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to theboilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent withfair use.

Please go tothe image description page and edit it to include afair use rationale. Using one of the templates atWikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described oncriteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at theMedia copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk)15:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having watched the movie and read the summary, I can firmly say that the summary provided does nothing to help me understand what I just watched. I'd modify the summary myself, but I don't understand the movie at all.— Precedingunsigned comment added byTerabiel (talk •contribs)06:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have written a plot synopsis that refers more closely to the actual plot, rather than patchy descriptions of the mise-en-scene, as appears in the current plot summary section. I wrote it the day after I watched the film for the first time, and I am quite proud of I was asked to merge it with the existing summary, but I found it highly unsatisfactory and tried to substitute my summary in full. Wikipedia rejected it, although they may have done so for valid editorial reasons. I have put it on my user page, if anyone wants to see it.— Precedingunsigned comment added byQuovadisdaddy (talk •contribs)09:51, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

- I am pleasantly surprised by the quality of this article, which in my opinion well exceeds "start class". Just popping in to say I have enjoyed the quality of the article so far, and thanks to all those who contributed.Excalibur (talk)21:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class film articles
• Start-Class British cinema articles
• British cinema task force articles
• WikiProject Film articles