| This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did Nissan buy the nameplate trademark from AMC, or did they give it to them for free?Nospamtodd (talk)03:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The statement here that the Rogue/Qashqai is built off the Sentra platform is wrong. As noted on the Qashqai page, it was a fresh "clean-sheet" design - all the automotive press articles seem to have made the same mistake.Scunnerous (talk)07:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What the hell does "Important is to note that Rogue's C platform, is not a carry-over from the Sentra's, given that the platform suffered modifications (as in most of cars sharing a platform)." mean? The platform did not suffer any modifications and this is not even English. I'll be chucking this garbage out when I have time and reverting to what I previously edited myself with improved wording, though it WAS in English to start with.Scunnerous (talk)21:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why is it necessary to maintain separateRogue andQashqai/Dualis pages? I mean, they're not just related, they're the same car. Since Qashqai is the original, Rogue should simply be a redirect.118.208.150.121 (talk)06:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the Renault Koleos has to be added as Related Vehicle.
Also, if the pages of the Qashqai and Dualis are merged with this, may be the page for the Koleos should be merged.—Precedingunsigned comment added by148.206.91.131 (talk)15:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, that's not a Dualis, that's a Murano.115.64.228.228 (talk)04:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link onNissan Rogue. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online02:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can’t one get light leather interior added over charcoal if no grey leather?Gcson01 (talk)02:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I added a section on the KR15DDT investigation but I kinda suck at citation formatting, as the document and page referenced aren't typical "articles", but the links are in there. ````ZeeFBI (talk)21:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
| The user below has arequest that an edit be made toNissan Rogue. That user has anactual or apparentconflict of interest. Therequested edits backlog isvery high. Please beextremely patient. There are currently269 requests waiting for review. Please readthe instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it iswell sourced,neutral, and follows otherWikipedia guidelines andpolicies. |
Hello. I have a conflict of interest regarding Nissan, so I’m sharing suggested edits for review rather than editing directly. I’m proposing to add an Awards and recognition section, add a Safety section (IIHS), and revise the NHTSA engine investigation paragraph to reflect PE23-023 and recall 25V437. Sources are included below.
TheNissan Rogue has received multiple awards from automotive publications and organizations:
The Rogue received theInsurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) Top Safety Pick+ designation for the 2021 and 2022 model years and the Top Safety Pick designation for 2023 and 2026. It did not receive an IIHS award for 2024 or 2025.
| Test | 2021[7] | 2022[8] | 2023[9] | 2024[10] | 2025[11] | 2026[12] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Small overlap front | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good |
| Moderate overlap front (updated test) | Marginal | Marginal | Marginal | Good (original test) | Acceptable | Acceptable |
| Side impact (updated test) | Acceptable | Acceptable | Acceptable | Acceptable | Acceptable | Good |
| − | On December 13, 2023, the | + | On December 13, 2023, theNationalHighwayTrafficSafetyAdministration(NHTSA)openedPreliminaryEvaluationPE23-023intoreportsofenginefailuresinvolving theKR15DDTengine usedin Roguemodelsfollowingthe2022refresh.OnJune27,2025,Nissanissuedsafetyrecall25V437coveringcertain2021–2024Rogue vehiclesequippedwith the1.5-literVC-Turbo(KR15DDT) to addresspotentialbearing-relatedenginedamage. |