Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:NDTV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates tothe region ofSouth Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theNDTV article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives (index):1Auto-archiving period:28 days 
This article iswritten inIndian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,analysed,defence,realise) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus.
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCompaniesLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcompanies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconIndia:Delhi /Politics /TelevisionMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage ofIndia-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit theproject page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Delhi (assessed asMid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Indian politics (assessed asMid-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Indian television (assessed asHigh-importance).
WikiProject iconPoliticsMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMediaLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofMedia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject Media To-do List:

WikiProject iconTelevisionLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles abouttelevision programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you canjoin the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to thestyle guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Media mention
This article has beenmentioned by a media organization:

The last citadel of secularism is dowm

[edit]

Nobody takingThe wire seriously. ALt news founders hounded andjailed. Ravish Kumar left NDTV and turnsYouTuber. NDTV becomesGodi media and relentlesslybroadcasting Ram Mandir Pran Pratishtha. NDTV still reliable?BlackOrchidd (talk)10:13, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BlackOrchidd The reliabilityWP:RS of a publication in the context of Wikipedia is determined atWikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. You might want to discuss it there. This talk page is to discuss about the content of the article. —DaxServer (t ·m ·e ·c)18:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I am taking this issue to WPRS NB. Plz participate.BlackOrchidd (talk)06:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+ NDTVbroadcasted Modi's Temple inaugration in Abu Dhabi without break on 14th Feb 2024. Meanwhile the protesting farmers suffered in perils at Shambhu border, NDTV didnt spared a moment of screen time during the temple inaugration.BlackOrchidd (talk)07:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+ Finance miniter of BJP ruled government givinginterview to NDTV after a longboycott by BJP leaders earlier.BlackOrchidd (talk)07:43, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So? —DaxServer (t ·m ·e ·c)17:01, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality in Describing Adani Group's Acquisition and The Economist Citation

[edit]

Hi everyone, I noticed that the current phrasing describes the Adani Group as 'noted for its affinity with the ruling BJP government' and references The Economist’s statement about the news channel’s editorial shift after the acquisition. To maintain neutrality, would it be better to rephrase this to focus on the factual aspects of the acquisition, with The Economist’s perspective on the editorial change presented as a cited observation rather than implying a specific relationship between Adani and the government? Additionally, should we include the resignations following the takeover as a separate point to ensure clarity? I’d love to hear your thoughts.I.Mahesh (talk)11:55, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the wording challenges neutrality. It shouldn't be deleted entirely, but placing that phrase in the intro paragraphs gives in undue weight.CNN andThe Washington Post don't have similar incidents given undue weight in their intro paragraphs.Rshah1010 (talk)23:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a problem with mentioning the Adani Group's acquisition and the resulting perceived change in NDTV's political orientation in the lead section. The main problem is that NDTV's history from 1984 to 2021 is sparsely summarised in the lead section. If the lead were expanded to include a proportionate description of NDTV's earlier history, there would not be adue weight issue. — Newslinger talk01:26, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Rshah1010, the lead is an appropriate summary of section§ 2022 onwards: Acquisition by Adani Group. I don't see a problem. —hako9 (talk)02:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need to add content

[edit]

NDTV also has radio channel (NDTV 24x7 Radio) that is not mentioned in this article. Can you elaborate about its history and operations81.106.77.222 (talk)21:50, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:NDTV&oldid=1315729577"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp