Talk:Mud bogging
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. |
Why is this a redirect to mudding? This is a professional/semi-professional organization of mud RACING, the game, or sport of "Mudding" is significantly different. In that it's not specialized cars, nor is it anything to do with timing, it's performing donuts, and other sorts of tricks and maneuvers of driving skill in mud pools and puddles after rain.
Request removal of the redirect.207.144.82.31 (talk)22:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)mudding is like so fun[reply]
I second this objection. This is not an article about the recreational activity of driving vehicles through mud, this article is about the organized sport. Muddin' should not redirect here. Using this article to describe the recreational activity Muddin' is like using an article on the Bassmasters Classic competition to describe all fishing.147.155.182.23 (talk)03:47, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why you want to object to the redirect, since there is no wiki page about what you call "recreational mudding", removing the redirect will simply lead people to nowhere. If you want a page dedicated to the amateur applications of this sport, someone needs to design a page for it. Don't complain unless you're willing to undergo the pain. Until then, I think the redirect is accurate.MisplacedFate1313 (talk)17:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Mud Run" is a running event on foot -- no vehicles involved. Should not redirect to "Mud Bogging."— Precedingunsigned comment added byKithmaker (talk •contribs)06:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree for reasons stated above. When googling "Mud Run" nothing with vehicles is a result.Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onMud bogging. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)15:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, this article needs more sources. A lot more. Much of it reads as a person reflection, which is inappropriate. Hence also the second tag. A better breakdown of the truck classes is really needed. While that probably varies between sanctioning bodies, as it stands an unfamiliar reader really doesn't learn anything about the type of trucks used from reading this article. (In fact, that's what I came here to find out, and was left still not knowing.)oknazevad (talk)14:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]