This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theMoorgate article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
![]() | Moorgate is aformer featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, checkthe nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page asToday's featured article on October 9, 2005. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status:Former featured article |
![]() | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article had a lot of pictures, some of which were a bit "uninteresting", and having so many caused layout madness in my browser when the pictures were longer than the article:
The Guildhall and the Moorhouse are nice to look at, but I'm not quite sure these are worthy of inclusion.Metaeducation20:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Having a separate section for Moorgate station and the tube crash doesn't seem to make a lot of sense when they have their own articles (Moorgate station,Moorgate tube crash). Perhaps the article on the crash should be integrated into the article for the station, but either way, duplicating the story here doesn't really seem to serve much purpose. I think a link works and will encourage people to improve those articles and speak more broadly about the Moorgate area itself here.Metaeducation20:16, 9 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
yeah-User:Carsoncocars
I've removed a reference to Moorgate being a "dual carriageway street". I walk along Moorgate every day, and it's not a dual carriageway (unlike nearby London Wall).—The precedingunsigned comment was added by192.18.1.9 (talk)02:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Someone was asking about a free map: try this page?http://informationfreeway.org/?lat=6713515.1532&lon=-9833.50212&zoom=17&layers=B000000Ojw12:45, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The main London article claims the gate is of medieval origin, and that it's the only London gate that didn't originate in the roman era. Neither article has a citation there. Anyone know which is true?Maltice (talk)16:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onMoorgate. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)18:22, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links onMoorgate. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)14:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onMoorgate. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)09:45, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]