| This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flibirigit, I thought that you might want to know something else I learned fromThe Globe and Mail - exactly what happened between theMontreal Jr. Canadiens and Kingston andRouyn-Noranda Huskies. Apparently in the spring of 1972, whenHap Emms was moving theNiagara Falls Flyers north to be theSudbury Wolves, the league was taking expansion bids from Soo, Thunder Bay and Kingston. The league rejected all three, and supposedly Tom Smythe of theToronto Marlboros was the one who was the main person against, because it would mean more home games andMaple Leaf Gardens was already booked so solid he was having trouble getting dates.
After an uproar, theSault Ste. Marie Greyhounds were admitted as a rival to Sudbury, while T-Bay and Kingston were rejected. Meanwhile, the Junior Canadiens were under threat of a lawsuit from theQMJHL, who wanted them back in their league (and obviously wanted a presence in the biggest city in Quebec).
The team owner applied for, and received, a year's suspension from the OHL, although the Globe reported "The team will likely not be back in the OHA". The next season, the QMJHL officially admitted a team under the same ownership and with a lot of the same players called theMontreal Bleu Blanc Rouge, and the QMJHL considered this team the same as the Junior Habs although they were not allowed to use the name.
Meanwhile, the OHA officially resurrected the "suspended operations" Junior Habs the following season and "moved" them to Kingston, even though there was new ownership and players.
So in answer to the question of who the legitimate successor to the Montreal Junior Canadiens is, the answer is "both, and neither". The Q team got the arena, ownership and players, while the O team got the name and place in the OHA. Or, to rephrase, if you ask the OHL office, Kingston is the Junior Habs, while if you ask the Q office, Rouyn-Noranda is. Weird, eh?BoojiBoy16:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-fee rationale completed.Flibirigit (talk)04:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-fee rationale completed. Image would likely qualify as{{PD-Canada}} in one year's time.Flibirigit (talk)04:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]