This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Philosophy:EthicsMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related tophilosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join thegeneral discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics

Who determines what is "normality"?(orig. posted to main article byUser:VinnyCee)

Can't we just assume that most people will understand what the word means?violet/riga(t) 7 July 2005 11:16 (UTC)

It's not a dictionary, sure, but the concept of "normality" in various contexts is most certainly encyclopedic information. The one from the disambig page that probably most likely applies here is the one toAssimilation (sociology). I've changed the article to link to that.Kurt Weber 7 July 2005 18:09 (UTC)

This page has beentranswikied toWiktionary. The article has content that is useful atWiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at eitherhere orhere (logs 1logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually triggerCopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed fromCategory:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot07:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The statement, in an encyclopedia, that moderation is characteristic for the Swedish national psyche is a bit far fetched. I have met enough Swedes who were all but moderate, for example in their drinking habits once they leave the territory of their homeland. You could go on and say that brutality is a characteristic of the German psyche, but as I said, there are about as many non-brutal Germans around as non-moderate Swedes, may be even more. The question is: shouldn't we better refrain from using generalizations of this nature, as a role?Hoppelpoppel (talk)12:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not up to wiki standards.

I came in search of the greek concepts of moderation and was given a smattering of different topics.— Precedingunsigned comment added by2601:645:4201:4AE0:A033:990F:BC99:2644 (talk)10:20, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be completely rewritten, and all the dead/nonsense links need to be redone.109.108.206.252 (talk)23:17, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Start-Class Philosophy articles
• Mid-importance Philosophy articles
• Start-Class ethics articles
• Mid-importance ethics articles
• Ethics task force articles
• Transwikied to Wiktionary