Talk:Michael D. Antonovich
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page. |
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I added the POV dispute, as lots of this page's material is taken from Antonovich's website for the Board of Supervisors (see especially, but not only,http://antonovich.co.la.ca.us/issues/issues.html).Dowiha03:42, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What is the deal with all the discussion of his fraternity? It seems a bit excessive.—Precedingunsigned comment added by24.5.66.49 (talk)01:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is biased. It reads like campaign literature.—Precedingunsigned comment added byUtbriancl (talk •contribs)01:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's biased. In both directions. I found no source to cite for the contentious claim that Antonovich's office prepared the report griping about the cost of illegal aliens, and removed it as required byBLP policy. But as we flesh out the article, it should gradually become less biased - as much as possible for an active politician. (It's a good bet that most if not all of the biographic sketches are ones he or his staff supplied. The [Metropolitan News profile] appears to be an honorable exception.)
--AndersW (talk)11:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is about tag cleanup. As all of the tags are more than a year old, there is no current discussion relating to them, and there is a great deal of editing done since the tags were placed, they will be removed. This is not a judgement of content. If there is cause to re-tag, then that of course may be done, with the necessary posting of a discussion as to why, and what improvements could be made. This is only an effort to clean out old tags, and permit them to be updated with current issues if warranted.Jjdon (talk)19:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest this article needs, among other things,
--AndersW (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)--AndersW (talk)05:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links onMichael D. Antonovich. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)12:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
