Any editor who hasnot nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to thegood article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as agood article. To start the review process, clickstart review and then save the page. See thegood article instructions.
Short description: Overthrow of presidents Rafael Zaldívar and Fernando Figueroa
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Central America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofCentral America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Central AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Central AmericaCentral America
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject El Salvador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofEl Salvador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.El SalvadorWikipedia:WikiProject El SalvadorTemplate:WikiProject El SalvadorEl Salvador
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Guatemala, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofGuatemala on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuatemalaWikipedia:WikiProject GuatemalaTemplate:WikiProject GuatemalaGuatemala
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related toLatin America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America
This article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Nicaragua, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofNicaragua on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.NicaraguaWikipedia:WikiProject NicaraguaTemplate:WikiProject NicaraguaNicaragua
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article iswritten inAmerican English, which has its own spelling conventions (center,color,defense,realize,traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below.Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such asthis nomination's talk page,the article's talk page orWikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hookhere.No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Created on 10 January. (Meets criteria). Length is okay too. Sourcing is neat and stylised in a clean way. Nearly no gaps at all. Hook is cited? Yes. Neutral and plagiarism- copyviolation-free? Yes. QPQ is done. As for interesting, I do find it interesting, so it's a tick/yes. However, I'm dubious as to the hook's wording. But as I'm not an English native, I leave that for DYK admins. Good to go. Great workCoryGlee18:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
Created on 10 January. (Meets criteria). Length is okay too. Sourcing is neat and stylised in a clean way. Nearly no gaps at all. Hook is cited? Yes. Neutral and plagiarism- copyviolation-free? Yes. QPQ is done. As for interesting, I do find it interesting, so it's a tick/yes. However, I'm dubious as to the hook's wording. But as I'm not an English native, I leave that for DYK admins. Good to go. Great workCoryGlee18:01, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
