| This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rewroted section on Australia. The Senate didn't actually vote against supply, they refused to vote on the subject.
Thanks for clarifying that.JTD 02:48 Jan 4, 2003 (UTC)
Supply has a capital letter because it is aformal constitutional term in a definition. Supply with a small 's' means something different. A 'Motion of Confidence', for example, would also have capitals, as a formal term.JTD 22:52 Jan 4, 2003 (UTC)
I just removed the following from the article:
Obviously the Senate didn't actually block supply, so if its not vandalism what's it trying to say?Colonial Overlord (talk)15:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onLoss of supply. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)07:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]