| This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guidelineWikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typicallyreview articles. Here are links topossibly useful sources of information aboutLofexidine.
|
The website for this drug is located athttp://www.lofexidine.co.uk . I may try expanding this article, but it will be my first edit aside from talk pages. I don't really know the ins and outs of wikipedia at all yet, so it'd be much better if someone else did it. The website doesn't have all that much information, but it's definitely got a lot more then wikipedia does.Tainted4206:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
From what I understand, lofexidine is not clinically equivalent to methadone as purported and the fact that one is commonly used at higher doses than the other is completely meaningless unless were going to discuss the pharmacological mechanism by which they both eliminate the some of the same symptoms (certain withdrawal symptoms). They're not equivalent because methadone provides a whole set of effects that lofexidine does not and they're not even clinically equivalent with regards to withdrawal symptom relief because lofex. does not allievate all the symptoms nor does it provide complete relief. I would simply say that it is a useful aid for mitigating some of the unwanted effects of opioid withdrawal due to its antagonism of alpha-2 andrenergic receptors. -Zach—Precedingunsigned comment added by66.191.120.105 (talk)02:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with the previous post on clinical equivalence. Additionally, the note on naltrexone being used to *attenuate* withdrawal symptoms is questionable at best, and might lead one to [wrongly] conclude that naltrexone can be used to provide relief from withdrawal in one actively dependent on opioids. Naltrexone is well-known to exacerbate (and indeed, precipitate) withdrawal in such individuals.—Precedingunsigned comment added by12.40.227.4 (talk)15:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is this compound a racemate [50% (R)-stereoisomer + 50% (S)-stereoisomer] or the pure (R)-stereoisomer or the pure (S)-stereoisomer? Stereoisomers regulary have a different pharmacology and different pharmacokinetics [E. J. Ariëns: Stereochemistry, a basis for sophisticated nonsense in pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 26 (1984) 663-668].--Jü (talk)20:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onLofexidine. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{dead link}} tag tohttp://www.lofexidine.co.uk/leaflets/bfl-pil-v4_07-2006.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)04:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]