This article is ratedStub-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

LinuxHigh‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofLinux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux High This article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.

I'm trying to find cites for the assertions on company stances made in the second paragraph. Please help.

Aamrod03:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category is called "Linux based devices" - do you think this would be a better name for this page? Or will we rename the cat after this page? Would be nice to have the names same... Any opinions welcome.--Kozuch (talk)20:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Shouldn't this page's (and the category's) name include a hyphen, i.e. "Linux-based devices"..?Sardanaphalus (talk)12:49, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • Yep, as of 2010 it is!Category:Linux based devices is nowCategory:Linux-based devices. --Hegpetz (talk)22:44, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is this page, there is the templateTemplate:Linux_devices and there is theCategory:Linux based devices. Do you think that we need them all. It seems that each of them is incomplete right now. I think haveing just the category is enough.--þħɥʂıɕıʄʈ^ʝɘɖı22:12, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To update re: the categories,Category:Linux based devices was automatically moved 12 April 2010 to the slightly renamedCategory:Linux-based devices. To your original question, they definitely need to be fleshed out to reflect each other or merged. I think the template should merge into the category. --Hegpetz (talk)22:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links onLinux-powered device. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20121005054446/https://plus.google.com/u/0/110023707389740934545/posts/R5YdRRyeTHM tohttps://plus.google.com/u/0/110023707389740934545/posts/R5YdRRyeTHM
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20110823092514/http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/documents/shs/shaval.htm tohttp://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/documents/shs/shaval.htm
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20050617041125/http://www.linuxdevices.com/cgi-bin/board/UltraBoard.pl tohttp://www.linuxdevices.com/cgi-bin/board/UltraBoard.pl

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)13:23, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Stub-Class Linux articles
• High-importance Linux articles
• WikiProject Linux articles