This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theKing James Version article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofChristianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theBible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles onReligion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help usassess and improve articles togood and1.0 standards, or visit thewikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to theEnglish language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofEngland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of thehistory of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofLondon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
King James Version is aformer featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, checkthe nomination archive) and why it was removed.
There's no real reason to do this, especially if it means pointing to random wordpress installations at domains liable to linkrot at any timeRemsense ‥ 论12:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Remsense, what about archiving the link? I think it is important because it is the lightweight form of the KJV, very portable. Sorry for causing trouble, just wanted to get community consensus. Are you an administrator?190.219.180.78 (talk)12:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's lightweight and rather hard to read. The PDF format is evil, but we link to PDFs because they are broadly useful. See alsoWP:NOTREPOSITORY. We're ultimately an encyclopedia, not a repository of primary sources, so when we do provide them we do best to be selective based on what our audience as a whole finds useful, not favoriting particular characteristics we personally value (to be clear, I personally sympathize with the motivations for providing this resource, but understand my ability to find utility in it is essentially an idiosyncrasy on my part.Remsense ‥ 论12:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I want to get consensus to add this KJV online with dictation website, as it is the best there is for searching the KJV, even better than all others. I want to invoke serious debate and discussion but I recognize I have no authority here and I am a servant of the democratic process.190.219.180.78 (talk)01:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.PK650 (talk)23:34, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see no reason for us to add a link to the monetised site purebiblesearch.com, and a Bible-specific search engine falls underWP:ELNO #9.NebY (talk)16:26, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
Not done for now: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.PK650 (talk)23:34, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
