Talk:Kham
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
"Upon invasion of Tibet by China, the name of the region was changed to Xikang Province (西康省 Xīkāng Shěng). It was, however, only a "special administrative district" until 1939 [dubious – discuss], when it became the status of a Chinese province - nominally and without much cohesion."
Tibet was invaded/occupied/liberated in the 1950s.Secretlondon (talk)12:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
quotation form the article: "Many Khampas are members of the Bön religion or 'Black sect' of Tibetan Buddhism, a group that had been largely marginalized and stigmatized by other Tibetan sects.[1]"Is there a source for calling the Bön religionblack sect?
There are two cites listed here (currently cite 10 and 11): ^ Smith (1996), p. 175^ Smith (1996), p. 175There's no indication of a first name, or the title of the book it's from. Does anyone know what source this is referring to?Longchenpa (talk)12:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
After this edit[1] I looked in the cited source (Tibet and its History, 2nd edition 1984 by Hugh Richardson) to see what it said about who granted titles in the Kham region in the 9th Century. In fact I found almost nothing about Kham at all. Pages 28 to 68 is a wide range to check, but pre-Yuan coverage appears to be mostly in pages 28-33, with a brief mention on pp.38-39, neither of which appear to mention Kham. The index does not indicate any coverage of Kham, Khampas, or East Tibet in pages 28-68. Unless someone can find where the information in this paragraph can be found in Richardson, I recommend removing the citation.--Wikimedes (talk)06:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No mention of the heavy involvement of Khambas in the anti-chinese guerillas of the 60's?41.219.31.12 (talk)04:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link onKham. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)07:29, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onKham. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)18:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
