| This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... I accidentally submitted it before I was finished writing the initial version. Delete it if you must, but it will be back shortly. --Feis-Kontrol (talk)03:39, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So there are no plans to connect this line to thestate that the city was actually named for? That's truly annoying. ---------User:DanTD (talk)14:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was:page moved.SounderBruce23:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
| The request to rename this article toKC Streetcar has been carried out. |
Kansas City Downtown Streetcar →KC Streetcar – Official name according tothe Kansas City Streetcar Authority website.Elisfkc (talk) 05:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)--Relisted.Natg 19 (talk)19:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I wondered about the numbers in the infobox - having 16 stops at a two-mile route would be very unlikely. Even the very old streetcar systems have stops at an average distance no less than 250m and in modern setups you'd put them at a distance of about 400m / quarter mile. I didn't find the original info in the given reference but the track map clearly shows it be really 8 stops, so the 16 is probably just "platforms". Also the spokeswoman said in a video that the track is 2.2 mile long. Those would be much more rational numbers indeed.Guidod (talk)09:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all - I'm not from Kansas City, so I wonder if you can help me. Some more photos and a nice route diagram would really help this article out, it's a bit bare right now!Turini2 (talk)16:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As per a wide variety of transportation articles, it's notWikipedia:CRYSTAL or speculation to include published proposals (such as the east-west line). (Clearly insertions by"Crayonistas" should be banished post haste!)
I've also reinserted useful information such as the length and cost of the extensions - clearly of interest to a layperson. I have significantly summarised the previous wording (completely understand the NOTNEWS point!), with headings as appropriate.Turini2 (talk)17:12, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]