Talk:Johor Sultanate
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article iswritten inBritish English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour,travelled,centre,defence,artefact,analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from othervarieties of English. According to therelevant style guide, this should not be changed withoutbroad consensus. |
 | This level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have a feeling that this article was picked up from somewhere__earth 08:32, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
Good start. But do a grammar and style check.
Section needs work and is unnecessarily convoluted. Note that members of each generation were basically the corresponding contemporaries of their family.
The whole article needs to be changed to the past tense. Large sections are written in the simple present. Opinions such as "unfortunately" need to be removed.—Precedingunsigned comment added by217.33.111.66 (talk)11:48, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Temengong line = Temengong of Singapore and Johor Abdul Rahman (not to be confused with the sultan of the rival line), his son Temengong Ibrahim, and his grandson Maharaja (and later sultan of Johor) Abu Bakar
Sultan of Johor, Singapore and Pahang: Tengku Hussein (later Sultan Hussein of Johore), his son Tengku Ali (later Sultan Ali of Singapore, and Pahang; was forced to renounce claims to Johore in favor of the temengong line), and his grandson Tengku Shah Alam (later Sultan of Muar; defeated in civil war by Maharaja Abu Bakar, his former temengong. Lost control of Muar due to debts; died in Singapore as head of the royal household).
Sultan of Linggi and Riau: Tengku Abdul Rahman (later Sultan Abdul Rahman of Linggi and Riau), his son Sultan Muhammad Shah and his grandson Muzafar Shah(deposed by his own Bugis nobleman in favor of Sultan Suleiman of Riau and Linggi).
The claims of the temengong line in Johor is substantiated by the renouncement by Tengku Ali (who renounced forcibly by the British), the Johor temengong line was subsequently elevated by queen victoria to the present day royal family of Johor. They have no royal claim on Singapore or Riau-Linggi. Interestingly, the royal descendants of Shah Alam still receive a royal stipend from the singapore government (albeit quietly) and were allowed to live out their days at their kampong glam palace, since they only leased the southern half to the british and can still lay claim as being the rightful royal family of the northern half of singapore, which they never did renounced, though they were obviously deposed as well defacto.—Precedingunsigned comment added by207.237.98.210 (talk)21:31, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
May I know the reason behind the move please?__earth(Talk)05:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
thanks for asking. my reasons were:
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onJohor Sultanate. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)12:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Should we really refer to the Johor Sultanate as an empire?Danial Bass (talk)02:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed there's a lot capitals listed for this country, but no source is given. Perhaps we should reduce the numbers of capitals to those that can be properly sourced.OwlCityzen (talk)17:09, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
