Talk:John Lambert (general)
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Encyclopædia Britannica (1911) says:
The more recenthttp://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9046943
So as other sources listed in the article agree with www.britannica.com it looks as if the 1911 got it wrong. --Philip Baird Shearer17:37, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The sections template was originally added to the Article page on 01:58, 29 July 2006 by the IP address 68.39.174.238. I moved it here because it is an editorial suggestion and not an aid to the reader of the article --Philip Baird Shearer09:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that this sentence is suitable: "Lambert's role in the Civil War and Commonwealth is now largely forgotten" at the beginning of the 'legacy' section. It seems like a particularly large article for somebody who has been forgotten.MC14:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Removed references to John Lambert, captin (sic) of the third batalian (sic) 3rd royal australian regiment sydneyLittlst (talk)11:20, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was reading a book called "VIES IMAGINAIRES" authored at 1896 byMarcel Schwob. In there is a quote allegedly (byJohn Aubrey) said or used by general Cambert (instead of Lambert in my translated copy probably by typo). After a internet research a found that the quote itself comes from John's Aubrey letter to Anthony Wood dated 15 June 1680. The letter is in start page of aubrey'sLives of eminent men, there is a publication in books.google.com in a collective vol.
Published in pages 197-201 (the quote is mentioned in page199).
I think that the quote should be added to this page!
Miklaf (talk)16:34, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... very interesting quote, but it could be saidof Lambert as opposed toby him, using the other version of one meaning the individual making the comment. Still, I think it should definitely be included either here or on wikiquote. Well spotted! CFury194.9.188.22 (talk)16:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
