| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theJeremy Strong article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1Auto-archiving period:12 months |
| This article was nominated fordeletion on October 20, 2010. The result ofthe discussion wasdelete. |
| This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page. |
| This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
The following Wikipediacontributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may includeconflict of interest,autobiography, andneutral point of view.
|
| On 3 October 2023, it was proposed that this article bemoved fromJeremy Strong (actor) toJeremy Strong. The result ofthe discussion wasMoved. |
This article has beenmentioned by multiple media organizations:
|
The current entry not only relies heavily on one source, it is word-for-word taken from the New Yorker profile in places.173.8.31.161 (talk)00:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article cites the New Yorker profile over 20 times, and seems to over-rely on that piece. Parts of the article simply re-state the profile, rather than provide basic biography. For example, there's a very lengthy section on "Acting philosophy and technique" which seemsoverly focused on this, while few other actors have such a section in their article. Really need to find more diverse and balanced sources for this biography. --ZimZalaBimtalk00:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the move request was:Moved(closed by non-admin page mover)BegbertBiggs (talk)23:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
– Clearprimary topic by usage (13,000% morepageviews) and significance (Emmy etc. winner). No dab page needed.Hameltion (talk |contribs)22:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
...do we really want to say this – in the second sentence of the article?Gnom (talk)19:39, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
involvement in films inspired by real-life events?— HTGS (talk)05:28, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On a recent article on Wikiportraits (https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/volunteer-photographers-are-fixing-wikipedias-terrible-celebrity-headshots-194454358.html) I put forth the view that certain photos are not desirable for wikipedia (such as the current image of Jeremy Strong) because they do not convey the wikipedia style as I interpret it. The current photo in particular looks like a studio shot that is designed to convey a certain persona that is usurping the wikipedia impartial view of the world and should be replaced. It suggests we have been taken over and corporatised. Here is what I wrote:
As a wikipedia editor i think it's important to remember that in some way wikipedia represents the viewpoint of the common man. It is not a direct participant at events but a mere spectator. As such the photos of celebrities looking directly into the camera feels inconsistent with this viewpoint. FWIW I would prefer to use photos for wikipedia that are more in the moment and not so staged. So sometimes a less perfect photo may be better if it is more real. It is also important not to flood Wikipedia with a particular style. Inconsistency is our style! The photo of Ben Stiller being interviewed is an example of a great photo for Wikipedia. It is not just about him but shows him (to a small extent) in his element of being a celebrity.NeedsGlasses (talk)02:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]