Talk:Impact factor
Page contents not supported in other languages.
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theImpact factor article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1Auto-archiving period:6 months |
| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives | |
| |
This page has archives. Sections older than180 days may be auto-archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4. |
This entire article features nary a single example. What is a good impact factor? What is a typical one? There isn't even a number listed anywhere I can see. This isn't useful to people trying to understand this as an evaluation.TricksterWolf (talk)14:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article says:
This means that, on average, its papers published in 2015 and 2016 received roughly 42 citations each in 2017. Shouldn't it say that on average its papers received 42 citations per year during 2015-2016?— Precedingunsigned comment added by2600:1702:5EB5:250:B570:1CEA:99FA:46D8 (talk)18:19, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]