This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

California:Los AngelesLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of theU.S. state ofCalifornia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. This article is supported byLos Angeles area task force. HotelsLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to thehospitality industry, includinghotels,motels,resorts, anddestination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. Travel and TourismLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oftravel andtourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

This is not the only hotel in the world of this name. I think it should be Hotel Bel-Air (California). The section headed "Reception" has had no source for years and looks like adcvertising.Chemical Engineer (talk)20:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Paul, in Saudi (talk)09:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hello everyone. i updated the lead, and added some more information to it, as well as a bit of info to the info box. will be making a few more edits as i go along -- let me know if you have any questions or concerns.GoGatorMeds (talk)16:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the wording of the lead and the history section in some areas, as well as added some more specific information. Again, let me know if there is anything you would like to discuss.GoGatorMeds (talk)17:19, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful to find secondaryreliable sources for the material you add. Even though we may think we know the facts, which have been widely reported, it's important that we present them as they have been presented by recognized published sources.SPECIFICOtalk19:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response, but I'm wondering which sources you're referring to that you do not think are reliable. Could you tell me which ones, so I can know what to do for future edits/sourcing?GoGatorMeds (talk) 19:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC

OK, pool view is mediocre quality snapshot, interior of guest room is not only bad snapshot, but also truly misleading.This is a luxury hotel with really great looking rooms and suites, which you can see here^[1] Do we really need photos of any kind, when we don't have a good ones which could give the right visual information? It is better not to have any, instead of misleading ones.Bialosz (talk)07:57, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't se any irrelevant images in this article. Relevance is what we normally go by. --SergeWoodzing (talk)12:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class California articles
• Low-importance California articles
• C-Class Los Angeles articles
• Unknown-importance Los Angeles articles
• Los Angeles area task force articles
• WikiProject California articles
• C-Class Hotels articles
• Low-importance Hotels articles
• WikiProject Hotels articles
• C-Class Tourism articles
• Low-importance Tourism articles
• WikiProject Travel and Tourism articles