This article is of interest toWikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of allLGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit theproject page or contribute to thediscussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofsociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofhuman sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPsychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is part ofWikiProject Gender studies. ThisWikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit theproject page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from:http://hayleysmallscaleresearch.blogspot.ca. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored,unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or"donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
Forlegal reasons, we cannot acceptcopyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source ofinformation, and, if allowed underfair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks andreferenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the originalorplagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see ourguideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violationsvery seriously, and persistent violatorswill beblocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you./wiae/tlk22:37, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am the one who wrote this article and I want to tell you that there is no violation as the copy text was copied forthis page on wikipedia which is open source for copy with no violation. I hope you understand.41.152.140.246 (talk)01:07, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. The user who put forth the claim that there was there is no scientific evidence supporting the change in DSM (as he wrote: "as the APA changed it based on VOTE[8] not scientific evidence, there were no new scientific evidence supporting such change."). If that is the case, why does the paragraph immediately before state "in December the American Psychiatric Association removes homosexuality from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-II), based largely on the research and advocacy of Evelyn Hooker." so: if there was no scientific evidence, what did Evelyn Hooker's research count as? This sounds like a homophobic attack by an uneducated person who would rather make gay people out to be mentally ill so they will have a legitimate reason to continue to marginalize and stop homosexuals and LGBTQ people from living their life. So, I took out the hateful lies.70.53.4.209 (talk)18:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've completed rewritten this page to tell a fuller story of how homosexuality has been treated in the DSM over the years, as well as additional background details on how changes came about. It was a big labor of love; hope folks find it helpful!RadicalCopyeditor (talk)19:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
