| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theHistory of Belarus article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1 |
| This It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First:
into the multi-ethnic Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia, with its capital initially in Horodno, later in Navahradak (now in western Belarus) and finally in Vilnia.
When didGrand Duchy of Lithuania became onlyRuthenia andSamogitia? Did not missed -Lithuania?
Horodno as a capital Grand Duchy of Lithuania? When? If you writing capitals of Grand Duchy of Lithuania write all of them – TrakaiKernavėVoruta ; not only which you like!
Second:
Initially mostly Ruthenian and Orthodox, with time most of them became polonized. This was especially true for major magnate families (Sapieha and Radziwiłł clans being the most notable)
Do you really think thatRadziwiłł family represents Orthodox? Family started fromTrakai (Lithuania) and later developed into 3 branches –Biržai–Dubingiai (Protestant branch), Olyka and Nieswiez (catholic branch); and a branch which died out very soon - Goniadz–Medele (catholic branch)
M.K.
I've removed two highly pov sections from the paragraph "Republic of Belarus. Communist economy in a political democracy." Most of the section read like a paranoid crusade to dismiss certain views on Belarus, and like a massive defense of Lukashenko. The phrases I've removed are:
AecisNo running, shouting orpiddling inthe shallow end18:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi folks. This article looks in dire need of re-writing and expanding, to me. What are the current hotspots here?Yury Tarasievich11:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The same number of lines described language limitations in Poland and mass extermination in Soviet Belarus. POV.Xx23608:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
So the intelectual elite murdered in 1937 died for the second time?Xx23608:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The same "Belarus population often collaborated with German occupation administration".Xx23608:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
False, Belarus had more population after the war than before it.Xx23608:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC). If 'after the war' means 40 years after -- this makes sense... the whole article on belarus seems to be written by non-natives, and has lots of false statements...[reply]
The word 'ethnos' is pretentious use of Greek, needless, and is not good English. Is the phrase 'ethnic group' not politically correct enough already? And what is wrong with 'the Belarussian people'?—Precedingunsigned comment added by41.185.167.243 (talk)13:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Szlachta (gentry) joined Napoleon's army - not mentioned here . (be-tarsk) Беларуская шляхта ў часе вайны 1812 году падтрымала Напалеона,Xx236 (talk)14:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WhichBelarusian language 1920-1939? There existed at least two dialects, not mentioningWest Polesian microlanguage. In another words - the Polish government didn't support unification of Belarusian language, was it oblidged to do it? Does Lithuanian government support unification of Polish language in Lithuania today, in the EU?Xx236 (talk)08:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The page is about History of Belarus. The Piasecki paragraph should be rewritten or removed.Xx236 (talk)10:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
But they established in 1943.Xx236 (talk)10:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article presents Belarus POV. History of minorities (Poles, Jews) should be described.Xx236 (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC) The article lacks references since 2012.Xx236 (talk)08:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onHistory of Belarus. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links onHistory of Belarus. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea what this means. Or is supposed to mean.Srnec (talk)00:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]