Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:History of Belarus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theHistory of Belarus article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1
This level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBelarusHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofBelarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theimportance scale.
WikiProject iconRussia:HistoryHigh‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Russia, aWikiProject dedicated to coverage ofRussia on Wikipedia.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at theproject page, or contribute to theproject discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
HighThis article has been rated asHigh-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe history of Russia task force.
WikiProject iconHistoryMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject ofHistory on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEuropean historyMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of thehistory of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Few more questions

[edit]

First:


into the multi-ethnic Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Ruthenia and Samogitia, with its capital initially in Horodno, later in Navahradak (now in western Belarus) and finally in Vilnia.


When didGrand Duchy of Lithuania became onlyRuthenia andSamogitia? Did not missed -Lithuania?


Horodno as a capital Grand Duchy of Lithuania? When? If you writing capitals of Grand Duchy of Lithuania write all of them – TrakaiKernavėVoruta ; not only which you like!


Second:

Initially mostly Ruthenian and Orthodox, with time most of them became polonized. This was especially true for major magnate families (Sapieha and Radziwiłł clans being the most notable)


Do you really think thatRadziwiłł family represents Orthodox? Family started fromTrakai (Lithuania) and later developed into 3 branches –BiržaiDubingiai (Protestant branch), Olyka and Nieswiez (catholic branch); and a branch which died out very soon - Goniadz–Medele (catholic branch)

M.K.


Pov removed

[edit]

I've removed two highly pov sections from the paragraph "Republic of Belarus. Communist economy in a political democracy." Most of the section read like a paranoid crusade to dismiss certain views on Belarus, and like a massive defense of Lukashenko. The phrases I've removed are:

  • "...radical right wingers use to call Belarus "the last dictatorship in Europe", a propaganda cliche used against left wing governments by private owned enterprises lobbying for its appropiation of public owned state controlled resources." (the reference for this claim is a news forum btw, which doesn't meet ourexternal link guidelines.
  • "...representative of frustrated capitalist interests in privatization of public enterprises. Under Lukashenko Belarus has seen economical prosperity with continuity of state control of the economy ("communism"). Eighty percent of the economy of Belarus remains under state control, just as it was in the Soviet Socialist Republic of Belarus. This is irritating to right-wingers, such as many in "the West" who fear that the example of Belarus demonstrates viability of communism in comparison to Russia´s experience with privatization and subsequent corruption and stealing of public resources."

AecisNo running, shouting orpiddling inthe shallow end18:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding this?

[edit]

Hi folks. This article looks in dire need of re-writing and expanding, to me. What are the current hotspots here?Yury Tarasievich11:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belarusian Soviet Republic and West Belarus

[edit]

The same number of lines described language limitations in Poland and mass extermination in Soviet Belarus. POV.Xx23608:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

including practically all its intellectual elite

[edit]

So the intelectual elite murdered in 1937 died for the second time?Xx23608:22, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polish population often collaborated with German occupation administration.

[edit]

The same "Belarus population often collaborated with German occupation administration".Xx23608:37, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In total, Belarus lost a quarter of its pre-war population in the Second World War

[edit]

False, Belarus had more population after the war than before it.Xx23608:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC). If 'after the war' means 40 years after -- this makes sense... the whole article on belarus seems to be written by non-natives, and has lots of false statements...[reply]

Ethnos

[edit]

The word 'ethnos' is pretentious use of Greek, needless, and is not good English. Is the phrase 'ethnic group' not politically correct enough already? And what is wrong with 'the Belarussian people'?—Precedingunsigned comment added by41.185.167.243 (talk)13:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1812

[edit]

Szlachta (gentry) joined Napoleon's army - not mentioned here . (be-tarsk) Беларуская шляхта ў часе вайны 1812 году падтрымала Напалеона,Xx236 (talk)14:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References, please. It is a known fact that Polish nobility hoped for liberation from Russia by Napoleon. There is no such thing as "Belarusianszlachta". Nobility is national concept, not ethnic. Nationalistic be-tarsk is poor source for historical facts, since it is skewed into exaggeration of Belarusian glory. - üser:Altenmann>t16:11, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nobility is national concept, not ethnic. - any sources? What aboutKonstanty Kalinowski? Members of gentry joined nationalistic anti-Polish movements, see Romer family,Andrey Sheptytsky. Four brothers were Lithuanian, Polish and Belarus (two Iwanowski-s,Tadas Ivanauskas, Ivanoŭski). The main division in Belarus was religious (Roman Catholic against Orthodox) rather than national.Xx236 (talk)08:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The usage of Belarusian language

[edit]

WhichBelarusian language 1920-1939? There existed at least two dialects, not mentioningWest Polesian microlanguage. In another words - the Polish government didn't support unification of Belarusian language, was it oblidged to do it? Does Lithuanian government support unification of Polish language in Lithuania today, in the EU?Xx236 (talk)08:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Piasecki ?

[edit]

The page is about History of Belarus. The Piasecki paragraph should be rewritten or removed.Xx236 (talk)10:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the Nazis attempted to establish

[edit]

But they established in 1943.Xx236 (talk)10:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

This article presents Belarus POV. History of minorities (Poles, Jews) should be described.Xx236 (talk) 08:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC) The article lacks references since 2012.Xx236 (talk)08:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links onHistory of Belarus. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links onHistory of Belarus. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"independent feudal consolidation"

[edit]

I have no idea what this means. Or is supposed to mean.Srnec (talk)00:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Belarus&oldid=1260459269"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp