Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Grumman F-14 Tomcat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theGrumman F-14 Tomcat article.
This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL
Archives:1,2,3,4Auto-archiving period:2 years 
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theOn this day section onDecember 21, 2020.
This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMilitary history:Aviation /Technology /Weaponry /Middle East /North America /United States
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation:criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy:criterion met
  3. Structure:criterion met
  4. Grammar and style:criterion met
  5. Supporting materials:criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military aviation task force
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
Taskforce icon
Weaponry task force
Taskforce icon
Middle Eastern military history task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force
WikiProject iconAviation:Aircraft
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of theAviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists ofopen tasks andtask forces. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
B checklist
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation:criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy:criterion met
  3. Structure:criterion met
  4. Grammar and style:criterion met
  5. Supporting materials:criterion met
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe aircraft project.
WikiProject iconUnited States:Military historyLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to theUnited States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported byWikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
WikiProject iconIranLow‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related toIran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, pleasejoin the project where you can contribute to thediscussions and help with ouropen tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
LowThis article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

This led to the development of a bleed system that temporarily blocks the frontalintake ramp and reduces engine power during missile launch

[edit]

This statement appears in the 'Engines and structure' section. It needs to be either reworded or deleted. Does anyone know what it really means? eg what source wording has it been paraphrased from? Thanks.Pieter1963 (talk)22:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

F110-GE-400 thrust values

[edit]

I noticed that the thrust given for the F110-GE-400 in the Specifications section is theinstalled thrust from on the NAVAIR 01−F14AAD−1.[1] I believe the baseline for engine thrust values in Wikipedia aviation articles is static, sea-level,uninstalled thrust in order to establish a more consistent comparison, and as far as I can tell this is the case for all of the other fighter articles. Installed thrust will vary based on the atmospheric or flight conditions. By most accounts, the uninstalled maximum thrust is 28,200 lbf.[2][3]

The F110-GE-100 on the F-16C Block 30 has a thrust of around 28,200 lbf uninstalled, the values for the F110-GE-400 fluctuated somewhat due to modifications throughout the 1990s, including a afterburner liner modification to enable safe afterburner usage under 10,000 ft (there's an infamous explosion of a -400 that destroyed an F-14B which lead to this). Generally GE puts the -400 thrust as slightly lower at the 27,000 lbf range uninstalled, and I've seen it anywhere from 26,950 to 27,600 lbf.[4]Steve7c8 (talk)17:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^https://info.publicintelligence.net/F14AAD-1.pdf
  2. ^http://www.anft.net/f-14/f14-specification.htm
  3. ^https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.1987-1849
  4. ^"GE Aircraft Engines Military Engine Status Report" (Press release). General Electric. 15 June 1997.

Dubious: forestall interference from Secretary McNamara

[edit]

"In order to save time andforestall interference from Secretary McNamara, the Navy skipped the prototype phase and jumped directly to full-scale development; the Air Force took a similar approach with its F-15."

The previous section states: "InJuly 1968, the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) issued a request for proposals (RFP) for the Naval Fighter Experimental (VFX) program [which led to the F-14]". Full scale development cannot precede the RFP it is based upon, and in any case the contract was awarded aroundFebruary 1969, according to the following sentence in this article ("The F-14 first flew on 21 December 1970, just 22 months after Grumman was awarded the contract").

Robert McNamara left office as Secretary of Defense onFebruary 29, 1968, five months before the F-14 RFP and a full 12 months before the contract was awarded. He was not in office to affect let alone interfere with development of the F-14.Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk)19:11, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DeLand Naval Air Station F-14B

[edit]

Good Afternoon! I just started as a Museum Tour guide for DeLand Naval Airstation and I just noticed a possible error. The Wikipedia articles lists as displaying anF-14A but we actually display anF-14B. Is this because our F-14 was converted to a F-14B or is this an actually mistake? Thanks!EscandellJ (talk)20:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EscandellJ I know I'm a year late, and I see that you already changed the article, but yes, you are correct. The aircraft on display is BuNo 161426, c/n 436. 161426 was originally built as an F-14A-120-GR, but was later upgraded to F-14A+-120-GR standard (later redesigned to F-14B-120-GR). -ZLEAT\C18:44, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. I made this change a year ago when I first started at DNAS Museum, and I didn't know how it worked. Thank you for correcting me!2600:1006:B168:BFC1:BC38:E337:7BB3:68A1 (talk)19:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grumman_F-14_Tomcat&oldid=1328873205"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp