Talk:Green liberalism
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between16 August 2021 and17 December 2021. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):CJTheReader.
Above undated message substituted fromTemplate:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment byPrimeBOT (talk)21:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are availableon the course page. Student editor(s):Bellamelodia,Villap95. Peer reviewers:Zoe Mara Talamantes,Bengutman.
Above undated message substituted fromTemplate:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment byPrimeBOT (talk)22:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"The reason stated is that liberalism is repulsed by authoritarian politics, which the Green Parties do not explicitly reject."? Can someone please explain this? -Jeandré, 2004-05-04t18:45z
The link to "Green Parties World Wide" seems questionable. Green != green liberal. E.g. for Sweden, the listed party here is the left-wingMiljöpartiet, whileCenterpartiet, who actually call themselves both "green", "green vote" ("grön röst"), "liberals" and "green liberals" is not listed. If the link is to stay, its scope needs to be explained since it does not have a NPOV but probably will be understood as having one.130.237.57.80 (talk)13:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Many of the claims made are vague due to words such as "very," "seem to," "somewhere between," "slightly less," etc, which leave room for debate or different interpretations. Most of the political claims are made in the middle sections, however, there are no references made. (Also, the third link of references does not work.) Much more information can be added about how green neoliberalism came about and how it became a global sensation. Although the section is titled "philosophy," only the first sentence explains what green neoliberalism is. The philosophy and ideologies of green neoliberalism (what it exactly is) can be expanded upon.Sharonjchoi (talk)05:44, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, this is a good start! Although, there are a few potential improvements I see. For one, the information provided needs more citations as it's unclear where the information is coming from. Additionally, it would be helpful to have more sources in general to gain a wider perspective on the topic. Also, the link to the 3rd online source seems to be broken. I attempted to find it elsewhere online but was unsuccessful. One more suggestion would be to create a separate section on the history of the green liberalism movement including it's origin and main actors to provide a little more context.Chriswilson (talk)08:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why is there a link toBright Future, which is not described as green on its wikipedia page, but none toViðreisn, which is?Pkoppenb (talk)08:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is a good start. I strongly recommend adding aspects of green liberalism that go beyond its philosophical component. For example, how has it been used to inform practice, policy or group and individual based actions? Additionally, I would suggest adding the various critiques, viewpoints and way green liberalism has been engaged with as a discourse. This would demand incorporating more sources to allow for a more balanced view point.Zoe Mara Talamantes (talk)06:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Zoe Mara Talamantes 10:33, 11/23/2017[reply]
