This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

ChristianityLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofChristianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale. ScotlandLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofScotland andScotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

Currently, the article states:

"Things strangled and blood were rigorously abstained from; the lot was regarded as sacred; the accumulation of wealth they held to be unscriptural and improper, and each member considered his property as liable to be called upon at any time to meet the wants of the poor and the necessities of the church."

The term "lot" -- the meaning of which is entirely obscure -- is linked to a disambiguation page, and no further indication is given as to what its meaning might be. I have removed the pointless link to adis-ambiguation page on the grounds that it makes this already (from the context) inexplicable use of English even moreambiguous, and strongly suggest that:

(a) the term "lot" is comprehensively defined within this article, and

(b) if there is to be a linkage to somewhere else, that the said linkage is specifically to the precisely appropriate article.129.94.6.2818:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The term lot would have signified the practice ofdrawing lots, as exemplified in Scripture (Acts 1:26) by the method used to choose the twelfth apostle to replace Judas Iscariot. It is not so obscure if you are familiar with the New Testament record, though I admit that I don't have any specifically Sandemanian reference to support the statement.DFH18:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the spelling of this article name should be changed to Glassite. In my (occasional) reading and correspondence on the subject over a number of years I have almost always found the spelling Glassite. It is also the spelling given in OED (1st Ed.). It also reflects better the pronunciation of the name. The surname of the founder was spelt Glas but this changed in later generations (and perhaps even in his own) to Glass. Certainly it is found as the posthumous spelling of his own name. See, inter alia, OED (1st Ed.) article Glassite. For now I have just added Glassite as an alternive spelling.Spathaky (talk)13:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On page 58 Cantor connects a term linked to Sandemanians, 'Kail Kirk', with the serving of Scotch broth during the Love Feast. His original research cites G.R. Sims' book published in London in 1917. CUoD 14:08, 10 December 2009 (UTC)—Precedingunsigned comment added byJamAKiska (talk •contribs)

Organizing archive of past discussions.CUoD (talk)23:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. ibid is not a great idea for e-documents - if I add another sentence and ref it then the following ibids will read wrong,
2. pics should be thumb size
3. some of you stuff say on snndeford is not in the sandeford article
4. you might like to play with themain template.
5. don't think your article now has stuff from britannica or nuttalls ... if it does then ref those bit and lose the odd nuttalls ref
6. thus? ... bit of an antiquated term?
7. "picture - lower right ..... might not be exacltly there on my iphone?
8. this article is a "B" i think when polished and maybe GA after some style moves

Hope that helpsVictuallers (talk)22:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed, thanks. Can you provide a clue for number 3? The Glasite introduction and 1st section paraphrase virtually word for word the britannica article. Not sure how to footnote that type of entry correctly. My inclination would be to add this source to the Bibliography section as a general reference. ...Thus (creature of habit), I conclude this edit is an improvement over the last. I look forward to your next entry...thanksCUoD (talk)13:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliographical work by author.CUoD (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Edited references and bibliographyCUoD (talk) 21:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC)/* Sandemanian Churches in England */ Simplifying link to new article.CUoD (talk) 00:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Date adjustment for moving London congregation to Paul's Alley.CUoD (talk)02:11, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reference in this article to Horace Marshall's article "History of Danbury" I am curious if anyone knows where a copy of this work is located?

thanks

Tommyborsh (talk)17:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onGlasite. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. You may add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing forhttp://www.dundee.ac.uk/archives/source-history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue orfailed to let others know (documentation at{{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}04:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onGlasite. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20140819084008/http://arccat.dundee.ac.uk/dserve.exe?&dsqIni=Dserve.ini&dsqApp=Archive&dsqCmd=show.tcl&dsqDb=Catalog&dsqPos=0&dsqSearch=((text)=%27glasite%27) tohttp://arccat.dundee.ac.uk/dserve.exe?&dsqIni=Dserve.ini&dsqApp=Archive&dsqCmd=show.tcl&dsqDb=Catalog&dsqPos=0&dsqSearch=((text)=%27glasite%27)

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)17:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• B-Class Christianity articles
• Low-importance Christianity articles
• WikiProject Christianity articles
• B-Class Scotland articles
• Low-importance Scotland articles
• All WikiProject Scotland pages