| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theGilad Shalit article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
| Archives:1,2Auto-archiving period:2 months |
You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of yourcommon.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning{display:none;} Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related totheArab–Israeli conflict, which issubject to theextended-confirmed restriction. You are not anextended-confirmed user, soyou must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make anedit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
Warning: active arbitration remedies Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates totheArab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
This page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.
| This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page. |
| This article is ratedB-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia'sMain Page in theOn this day section onJune 25, 2009,June 25, 2010,June 25, 2012,June 25, 2016, andJune 25, 2020. |
Archives |
| 1,2 |
This page has archives. Topics inactive for60 days are automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than5. |
Please use proper terminology and change the word militants into terrorists.— Precedingunsigned comment added by2A02:A420:28:41D7:21C6:E994:3C91:F713 (talk)16:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to most israeli news sources, such asthis one, Gilad Shalit was dischareged from the I.D.F with the rank of Sergeant First Class (רב-סמל) and not Seargent Major (רב-סמל מתקדם) likethis source states.
It is possible that the later source is mistaken due to a mistranslation of sorts.
Therefore, i suggest changeing the rank description back to "Sergeant First Class" a.k.a "Rav Samal" and "Rasal" (רב-סמל, רס"ל).

Under the Capture Header under subheader Treatment, "harsly" is said instead of "harshly". I cannot check the source due to paywall if it was initially misspelled.Einail19 (talk)13:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi all—in the "Captivity" section of this article, there is a mention of a publicly-released image of him holding up a newspaper dated 14 September 2009. A citation for this is needed. I found one from theBBC, and another fromNBC News, both of which refer to this event. Please add these sources when next available. Thank you for your help!
Wikipedia on!Fruitworth (talk)00:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As simple as that: Gilad Shalit is not MIA (missed in action).C arbetman (talk)01:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thisedit request has been answered. Set the|answered= parameter tono to reactivate your request. |
Remove the following text, it unnessecarily repeats the main conclusion of the section in an emotionally charged manner. The attached reference also does not mention either points.
Diff:
| − | + |