This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofcompanies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofGermany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it refers to Gigaset AG, a separate company from Gigaset Communications GmbH. It has its own history, many years of existence, and other names by which it was known in the past. --~2025-33143-39 (talk)08:24, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of arequested move.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider amove reviewafter discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Merge. The former Siemens Home and Office Communication Devices and the former Arques AG should be in one article namedGigaset, the two standalone articles are unnecessary. Note that the article currently here atGigaset AG was created only a week ago.162 etc. (talk)17:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@162 etc.: I'm not firmly opposed to a merge, but that's not what's being discussed here. I assume you'd want to mergeGigaset Communications into this article? If that's the case, there's still the question of whether the article title should include the legal suffix at the end or not.Zeibgeist (talk)08:52, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support restoring article title toGigaset. A merge needs to be considered separately, not as part of a requested move; I could see a merger being controversial without a proper merge or AfD discussion.Zeibgeist (talk)19:45, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This reverses an undiscussed move by a user who was subsequently indeffed. More work may be necessary but this is a logical first step.Andrewa (talk)23:09, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
