Friedrich Nietzsche is a formerfeatured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check thearchive.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join thediscussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofatheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or seeinfo box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members ofAtheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generatingneologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (seedeletion process).
State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, pleasejoin the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to beinactive.
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofGermany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpolitics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of theMilitary history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see alist of open tasks. To use this banner, please see thefull instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the followingcriteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofpoetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Zoroastrianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofZoroastrianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZoroastrianismWikipedia:WikiProject ZoroastrianismTemplate:WikiProject ZoroastrianismZoroastrianism
This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related tophilosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join thegeneral discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Assemble secondary sources:no original research, among other policies and guidelines:
Remove POV; i.e., what Nietzsche's position is, on many topics, ishighly debatable, and thus his views must not be slanted or implied withoutsecondary sources (this means quotations of his works will amount tooriginal research, especially whenconsensus is indicative of this);
[[Herd behavior#Herd behavior in human societies|Herd instinct]] The anchor (#Herd behavior in human societies) has beendeleted by other users before.
[[Nihilism#Anti-nihilism|Anti-nihilism]]
[[Philosophical pessimism#Friedrich Nietzsche|Dionysian pessimism]] The anchor (#Friedrich Nietzsche)has been deleted.
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking thepage history of the target pages, or updating the links.
Remove this template after the problem is fixed |Report an error
Nietzsche's "aristocratic radicalism" and "paganism"
As far as I know, Nietzsche had approved of Georg Brandes' categorization of his thought as"aristocratic radicalism" (Letter to Georg Brandes – December 2nd 1887, see below), and hasn't contested polytheism and paganism - or even on the reversecalled himself a pagan - or at least claimed it - (The Will to Power - 1034) andpraised polytheism - or at least what he saw it to be (The Gay Science - 143).
- "Of Brandes' description of his philosophy, Nietzsche himself remarked:"The expression 'aristocratic radicalism', which you employ, is very good. It is, permit me to say, the cleverest thing that I have yet read about myself"."
- "We, many or few, who once more dare to live in a world purged of morality,we pagans in faith, we are probably also the first who understand what a pagan faith is: to be obliged to imagine higher creatures than man, but to imagine them beyond good and evil; to be compelled to value all higher existence as immoral existence.We believe in Olympus, and not in the "man on the cross.""
- "The Greatest Utility of Polytheism... In polytheism man’s free-thinking and many-sided thinking had a prototype set up: the power to create for himself new and individual eyes, always newer and more individualised: so that it is for man alone, of all the animals, that there are no eternal horizons and perspectives."
Hello. To clarify, I'm not disputing whether he labelled himself as such. The first sentence is for what the subject is notable for (perMOS:FIRSTBIO). Notability is determined through secondary sources. If you have reliable secondary sources about the categorization of his philosophy, you can add content about it in thephilosophy section. Alternatively you can add content toPhilosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche as well. Keep in mind that we cannot analyze primary sources ourselves perWP:PST and that there are different opinions in secondary sources.StephenMacky1 (talk)16:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to propose the following additions to the philosophy section of Nietzsche's article:
"Aristocratic Radicalism"
Nietzsche explicitly approved Georg Brandes' characterization of his philosophy as "aristocratic radicalism." This can be cited with Brandes’ analysis and Nietzsche's letter to Brandes dated December 2, 1887, as noted by secondary sources such as [Insert secondary source].
Proposed text:
"Nietzsche endorsed Georg Brandes' description of his philosophy as 'aristocratic radicalism,' calling it 'the cleverest thing that I have yet read about myself' in a letter dated December 2, 1887."
"Paganism"
Nietzsche referred to himself as a "pagan" in The Will to Power (1034) and praised polytheism in The Gay Science (143). Secondary sources discuss Nietzsche’s self-identification and his admiration for polytheistic systems as a framework for individual freedom and creativity, e.g., [Insert secondary source].
Proposed text:
"Nietzsche described himself and his followers as 'pagans in faith,' who live 'in a world purged of morality.' He praised polytheism for its capacity to encourage free-thinking and individual perspectives, contrasting it with monotheistic faiths."
These additions aim to clarify important aspects of Nietzsche’s philosophy, supported by reliable secondary sources. I welcome feedback on the phrasing and placement of these points.YitzhakEybeschutz (talk)23:57, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to propose the following additions to the philosophy section of Nietzsche's article:
"Aristocratic Radicalism"
Nietzsche explicitly approved Georg Brandes' characterization of his philosophy as "aristocratic radicalism." This can be cited with Brandes’ analysis and Nietzsche's letter to Brandes dated December 2, 1887, as noted by secondary sources such as [Insert secondary source].
Proposed text:
"Nietzsche endorsed Georg Brandes' description of his philosophy as 'aristocratic radicalism,' calling it 'the cleverest thing that I have yet read about myself' in a letter dated December 2, 1887."
"Paganism"
Nietzsche referred to himself as a "pagan" in The Will to Power (1034) and praised polytheism in The Gay Science (143). Secondary sources discuss Nietzsche’s self-identification and his admiration for polytheistic systems as a framework for individual freedom and creativity, e.g., [Insert secondary source].
Proposed text:
"Nietzsche described himself and his followers as 'pagans in faith,' who live 'in a world purged of morality.' He praised polytheism for its capacity to encourage free-thinking and individual perspectives, contrasting it with monotheistic faiths."
These additions aim to clarify important aspects of Nietzsche’s philosophy, supported by reliable secondary sources. I welcome feedback on the phrasing and placement of these points.YitzhakEybeschutz (talk)09:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The lead is missing a "the" in "one of the," yet more importantly while Nietzsche is certainly extremely influential and popular, there's too much repetition in the lead, of influential--which is unsurprising. It's said twice in the latter sentence that mentions it, but was already said in that preceding sentence that has been in place much longer.Cdg1072 (talk)14:55, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The first lines of the lead have shifted several times over the years, as readers of the article have contended with what labels should describe Nietzsche in his overall career. "Poet" and "composer" were at one point removed, and "prose poet" had its time until it was rejected. These periodic shifts are hardly avoidable, and it may happen that we see the first lead sentence "scrubbed" yet again sometime.Cdg1072 (talk)20:03, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]