This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

AutomobilesMid‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofautomobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile Mid This article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale. TrucksLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage oftrucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theimportance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for90 days are automatically archived byLowercase sigmabot III if there are more than5.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links onFord Ranger (North America). Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20110524113338/http://www.carautoportal.com/ford/ford-ranger.php tohttp://www.carautoportal.com/ford/ford-ranger.php
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20110723045856/http://rockledge.home.comcast.net/~rockledge/RangerPictureGallery/SHO/SHORanger.pdf tohttp://rockledge.home.comcast.net/~rockledge/RangerPictureGallery/SHO/SHORanger.pdf
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20121007092408/http://media.ford.com/press_kits_detail.cfm?presskit_id=2123&item_id=5790&press_section_id=2870 tohttp://media.ford.com/press_kits_detail.cfm?presskit_id=2123&item_id=5790&press_section_id=2870
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20100407200204/http://www.iihs.org/ratings/roof/detailsbyclass.aspx?75 tohttp://www.iihs.org/ratings/roof/detailsbyclass.aspx?75
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20120321085602/http://www.ford.com.ar/ford2010/popup/ford_manual/manuales/manual_ranger.pdf tohttp://www.ford.com.ar/ford2010/popup/ford_manual/manuales/manual_ranger.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)16:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links onFord Ranger (North America). Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20110706080721/http://www.blogdecoches.com.ar/ford-f-100-la-pick-up-mas-vendida-en-la-historia-argentina/ tohttp://www.blogdecoches.com.ar/ford-f-100-la-pick-up-mas-vendida-en-la-historia-argentina/
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20091007021009/http://media.ford.com/images/10031/September09sales.pdf tohttp://media.ford.com/images/10031/September09sales.pdf
• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20090618012747/http://blogs.edmunds.com/straightline/2008/08/ford-tables-plans-for-f-100-pickup.html tohttp://blogs.edmunds.com/straightline/2008/08/ford-tables-plans-for-f-100-pickup.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)01:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there so much detail on this page about Ford trucks and SUVs which are not the Ranger? If they share a platform, they should be listed in "Related" in the infobox, get a brief one or two sentence mention, and links to their respective pages. --Vossanova^o<15:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The gallery, especially, is excessive. A brief mention of the fact that the Ranger chassis spawned other vehicles is sufficient. --Sable232 (talk)23:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see thatMazda B series only features the international version of the truck; it directs to this page for the North American (post-1993) version. I'm not sure whether the Mazda section in this page should be moved to Mazda B series, or kept here, since the post-1993 B series was derived from the NA Ranger. It would be nice to have all the Mazda info and galleries on one page, but I know we like to keep rebadges in the same place. Beyond that, the Explorer Sport Trac, Explorer, Bronco II, and Aerostar sections can go for sure. --Vossanova^o<17:37, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since the B-series article is about a completely different lineage of truck, it would probably be less suitable to include the Ranger-based model there. It's so closely related to the Ranger that I feel it can remain in this article, although whether it's better to have a separate section at the end or have the information interspersed throughout I don't know. --Sable232 (talk)19:37, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth-generation section was recently split off intoFord Ranger (fourth generation) with no discussion. I don't believe there is enough content there to justify a new article at this time, but I'd like to hear other opinions before considering a revert. --Sable232 (talk)00:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support I also find it interesting that it showed up out of nowhere. While it should have been discussed further, I do agree with its format (to start with...) for a couple of reasons. First, a secondary article allows for an expansion of content without stretching the main article out too far in length (for example, think of how long theFord F-Series article would be if one eliminated all the related secondary articles). Additionally, the new article performs the same function for theFord Ranger (T6) article (the vehicle it from which it is derived). This article creation follows the example ofToyota Corolla andVolkswagen Golf (admittedly, these are further evolved...). It also helps that this is a current production vehicle; a secondary article will likely grow in size and content along the way over the next few years. --SteveCof00 (talk)11:00, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion I believe there is an error in the page regarding the generations. The 2019-2023 is known as the fifth generation, not fourth. Here is a supporting link from a Ford Dealer disclosing that the US did not receive the fourth generation Rangerhttps://www.fordlincolnofcookeville.com/blog-ford-ranger-generations-and-model-years/

--NewEnglandCivilEng (talk) 14:38, 26 March 2024(UTC)

While the current generation was split off into its own article without discussion, this topic is here for whether or not to do so on the other three generations. ISupport the idea for several reasons, although it will be a fairly large undertaking.

• Doing so will allow some streamlining of the article without an actual loss of content.
• This has been done withFord F-Series (admittedly, a model family involving several more articles)
• The format of theFord Ranger disambiguation page is a good base for including further article links.

Any thoughts? --SteveCof00 (talk)11:09, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class Automobile articles
• Mid-importance Automobile articles
• C-Class Trucks articles
• Low-importance Trucks articles