This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:

Musical InstrumentsLow‑importance This article is within the scope ofWikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofmusical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments Low This article has been rated asLow-importance on theproject's importance scale.

This section only had fender and warmoth, which does not add anything to the page and in fact makes it seems suspiciously like advertising that they were here in the first place.—Precedingunsigned comment added by208.50.108.50 (talk)00:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Another advantage is that the player only needs to apply a fraction of the pressure to a scalloped fingerboard to make the note sound, as compared to a traditional fingerboard. This allows the guitarist to play faster, because they don't have to invest as much effort into fretting each note."

Sources? From everything i've read (including an interview with Yngwie, who's probably the most popular guitarist who plays scalloped fretboards) and from personal experience, scalloped necks do NOT help you play faster, it's actually more difficult to play fast on a scalloped neck.necroforest 23:06, 3 December 2006

As an owner of two Fender stats one scalloped and one non scalloped I can state that the scalloped neck does not magically enable one to play faster. It in fact makes no difference at all. The amount of pressure required to fret the note is similar if not exactly the same. I don't have any sources to back this up. This is purely personal experience playing on a standard strat and a Yngwie Malmsteen strat.

I've added one source. --GreyCat15:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree that the reason most guitarists play non-scalloped necks is because of the disadvantages of scalloping. The SCREAMINGLY OBVIOUS reason is simply that scalloping is a fairly exotic guitar modification that does not appear most mainstream commercial guitar models, and most guitarists do not perform, nor have anyone perform, advanced, risky modifications on their guitars.—Precedingunsigned comment added by70.79.96.174 (talk)20:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the phrase "frets generally allow for more precise changes in pitch" is true in one sense and just the opposite of true in another sense. For a beginner, frets make intonation more precise than it would be otherwise. For a more advanced player, the precision necessary to control the nuance of a pitch so that it is higher or lower in different musical contexts is not generally aided by frets; in fact it is non-fretted instruments that allow this kind of pitch change (change within a single note instead of from note to note) to be controlled more precisely. My questions: should this be spelled out in the article? and if it should, how should it be phrased? The way I have put it here seems too wordy to me.J Lorraine04:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed "precise" to "consistent". It seems to be the word I'm looking for, but it still doesn't make the article communicate the information I've spelled out above.J Lorraine22:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this is better (I think), and also not too wordy.J Lorraine23:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why does the neck have to fan out so much from the nut toward the bridge? Spanish guitars dont taper so much--Light current17:50, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's easier to fret chords with the strings closer together, and it's easier to pick strings when they're farther apart. This makes it advantageous to have a wide string spacing at the bridge, and a closer spacing towards the nut. As a nice side effect, the lower frets are easier to form chords on (most chords are played lower), while the higher frets are easier to bend notes without mashing strings together (most bends are done higher).142.59.153.9901:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, spanish guitars have a wide string spacing already at the nut; why would they fan out even more? :)

Another thing: this tapering was likely copied from the (western orchestral) bowed instruments.—Precedingunsigned comment added by70.79.96.174 (talk)20:33, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THe diagram is confusing. The end nearest the viewer appears to be thebridge end when if fact it is referred to as thenut end in the text. Anyone else find it confusing?--Light current22:57, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it "appear to be the bridge"? It's a headstock end of neck towards the viewer. It's just a cross-section, without headstock glued in place. --GreyCat09:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because necks are wider at the bridge. (I know its aperspective dwg but still..).--Light current14:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's barely so. It's perspective, and, moreover, it's standard drawing used by lots of companies to depict their guitars' neck proportions (Ibanez, Washburn, I even recall viewing similar drawings in Gibson and Fender catalogues). --GreyCat06:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Standard or no standard, I assumed that the close end was the bridge as well.142.59.153.9901:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whats 'barely so'? 8-?--Light current14:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, it's not a confusing diagram. Just stating my opinion and referencing to other facts and other author of such diagrams. --GreyCat14:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On some modern guitars, the radius of the fingerboard changes slowly from one end of the fingerboard to the other. This is known as a "compound radius" fingerboard. The nut end of the fingerboard has a smaller radius towards the nut to ease in forming chords. The bridge end of the finger has a larger radius to prevent "fretting out" (having a string come into contact with a higher fret during a bend).

How does the smaller radius help form chords? Radius is useful on bowed instruments, because it lets the bow select individual strings. It's of no use on plucked instruments. Compound radius is a compromise: radius sucks, but you can't eliminate it entirely due to the commercial reality that guitars do not have adjustable string height at the nut, and guitar nuts are pre-fabricated to a radius. A compound radius can be accomodated using an off-the-shelf guitar nut, and an off-the-shelf bridge with adjustable-height saddles.—Precedingunsigned comment added by70.79.96.174 (talk)20:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that both articles cover the same subject (fretboard and its' parameters / varieties) and effectively a radius article would make a perfect section / extension for this fingerboard article. I also plan to add some more diagrams and images to illustrate radius. --GreyCat16:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, same rationale: article about scalloped fingerboard is relatively short and effectively describes a particular varity or aspect of a fretboard. It would make fingerboard article more complete, a perfect section for one. --GreyCat16:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is late, I know, but, fuck it.

I support this and your other merger proposal. --LifeEnemy04:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This part makes no sense whatsoever. From examining the (ad-like) accompanying photo, I think it's supposed to be discussing instruments with differing scale lengths from the treble to the bass. None of the text manages to convey this, though. Anyone care to delete?

I'd agree. Have tagged this as confusing meantime in case anyone can clean it up to extract meaning and pertinence but in the current form it beats me. Would be happy to see it go.Mutt Lunker22:11, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's an ad. Just traced a connection between the editor responsible for the original addition and the manufacturer:[1]. Text seems to be taken from here too:[2]. Will delete.Mutt Lunker22:31, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just deleted it again. The wikipedia is not the place to publicise new products, however brilliantly conceived. After working musicians have adopted this design in numbers sufficient to validate the concept, then it will be encyclopedia material. __Just plain Bill03:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Along with the most recent re-addition of the ad went the deletion of the section on scoop of fretless boards. While I don't own that or any other section or article of the wikipedia, I believe it to be encyclopedic and relevant here. __Just plain Bill13:15, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the external links, as they failWP:EL; but they make sense as references. I am slapping a tag for lack of footnotes; adding them would solve the problem.--Legionarius (talk)18:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The proper term for the lengthwise curve of the fingerboard (neck, really) is "relief". This comes up much more with guitar and mandolin family instruments as the relief can be adjusted.

Bravohalo (talk)06:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The only one I've heard calling it "relief" on bowed strings also works on guitars and mandos. I hear it primarily called "scoop" on bowed strings. There, scoop is not applied to the maple neck, but to the ebony fingerboard, and will be addressed every time the fingerboard is dressed (planed, shaped, shot, finished...) One could argue that the upper half (towards the pegbox/scroll) of the fingerboard forms a structural part of the neck... but it's still the fingerboard that gets the treatment. __Just plain Bill (talk)14:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manufacturing of Fingerboard was recently created. While conceivably eventually meriting a stand-alone article, I feel a merge toFingerboard is appropriate until or unless the coverages is long enough to warrant splitting.--Animalparty-- (talk)21:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For now, I don't see a need to do anything with it. This article could possibly use a section on the manufacture of fretted fingerboards, but that article is unsourced, and needs drastic copy editing to come up to minimum standard.Just plain Bill (talk)17:04, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Closing merge proposal given opposition and no support.Klbrain (talk)15:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link onFingerboard. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If necessary, add{{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add{{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/20081029225026/http://www.espguitars.co.jp:80/artist/kiko_loureiro/index.html tohttp://www.espguitars.co.jp/artist/kiko_loureiro/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set thechecked parameter below totrue to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online}17:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link onFingerboard. Please take a moment to reviewmy edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visitthis simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archivehttps://web.archive.org/web/20151108182752/http://www.hypercustom.com/yuichionoue.html tohttp://www.hypercustom.com/yuichionoue.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored byInternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other thanregular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editorshave permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see theRfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template{{source check}}(last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them withthis tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them withthis tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug)19:34, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I put atTalk:Manufacturing of Fingerboard, suggested late 2015 for merge intoFingerboard.

==not written here, but worthless anyway==

Seems to have been imported entirely from somewhere else. Would it kill ya toparaphrase a little?

Arguably, ALLstopped note stringed instruments (well, mostly) have afingerboard but most guitars have afretboard. The viol family has fingerboards (though, per my note, there are fiddles played without pressing the string to a solid surface).

The entry makes the gross misassumption that all fingerboards involve frets, require radiusing, and must be engineered so as to maximize "string bending" performance techniques.

And then the entry dodges away from traditional inlay work (without CNC) AND how/why frets are installed.

I see no reason for this to remain on its own. Poorly written, adds nothing to the conversation.

And I don't feel much better aboutfingerboard. I see no good reason that the intents of both should not be incorporated intofrets.
Weeb Dingle (talk)18:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposedManufacturing of Fingerboard for deletion.Just plain Bill (talk)16:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is theLinnStrument MIDI controller a fingerboard instrument? --Rob Kam (talk)11:55, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is a keyboard a fingerboard? I don't think so.Just plain Bill (talk)13:06, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a keyboard. From the description:

"So LinnStrument's notes are arranged as on any stringed instrument."

and

"You can tune the rows like a guitar, violin or however you wish. By default they are tuned in musical fourths (five semitones), like a bass guitar with 8 strings." --Rob Kam (talk)15:26, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's not exactly a keyboard. At NAMM in 2015, its inventor called it "an expressive replacement for a MIDI keyboard." It is a touch-sensitive MIDI input device, missing most of the tactile references of a fingerboard.Just plain Bill (talk)16:27, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• C-Class musical instruments articles
• Low-importance musical instruments articles