Talk:Error correction code
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | This level-5 vital article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content ofForward error correction wasmerged intoError correction code on 19 September 2020. The former page'shistory now serves toprovide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see itstalk page. |
Copied most of the material on this page fromForward_error_correction based upon discussion atTalk:Forward_error_correction#Misleading_title_-_split_the_article
For earlier talk seeTalk:Forward_error_correcionTom94022 (talk)19:48, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article includes the following example of a FEC benefit: "Long-latency connections also benefit; in the case of a satellite orbiting Uranus, retransmission due to errors can create a delay of five hours". Please correct me if I'm wrong, but pretty sure there are currently no (nor have there ever been) man-made, transmitting satellites around Uranus. What an odd example, why not cite Juno orbiting Jupiter, or the MRO orbiting Mars?Jsinnreich (talk)15:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
