Talk:Epik
Page contents not supported in other languages.
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly thoserepresenting the subject of the article, arestrongly advised not to directly edit the article. SeeWikipedia:Conflict of interest. You mayrequest corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, orcontact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article was nominated fordeletion on 21 April 2020. The result ofthe discussion waskeep. |
 | This article is ratedC-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale. It is of interest to multipleWikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Before requesting any edits to this protected article, please familiarise yourself with reliable sourcing requirements. Before posting an edit request on this talk page, please read thereliable sourcing andoriginal research policies. These policies require that information in Wikipedia articles be supported by citations from reliable independent sources, and disallow your personal views, observations, interpretations, analyses, or anecdotes from being used. Only content verified by subject experts and other reliable sources may be included, and uncited material may be removed without notice. If your complaint is about an assertion made in the article, check first to see if your proposed change is supported by reliable sources.If it is not, it is highly unlikely that your request will be granted. Checking the archives for previous discussions may provide more information. Requests which do not provide citations from reliable sources, or rely on unreliable sources, may be subject to closure without any other response. |
| This is thetalk page for discussing improvements to theEpik article. This isnot a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books ·news ·scholar ·free images ·WP refs) ·FENS ·JSTOR ·TWL |
Archives:1Auto-archiving period:12 months  |
 | Thecontentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates topost-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with thecontentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to thepurpose of Wikipedia, any expectedstandards of behaviour, or anynormal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Hello @Grayfell!Thank you for your feedback on some of my edits. I would like some clarification on your second revert on the lead, re-adding the statement "and became known as one of the few US-based registrars that routinely ignored reports of illegal activity." This was a recent change added on May 12th that I found to be a contentious editorialization of what the source actually states. Considering it was added to the opening statement of the lead, I believed it was too contentious for such placement without proper attribution. Adding the attribution felt out of place here due to weight so I opted to remove the statement entirely to do right byWP:NPOV. Please share your thoughts. I appreceiate your guidance!TXstockman5 (talk)22:46, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=icon}
