Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Talk:Emma Roddick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article must adhere to thebiographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced orpoorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentiallylibellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue tothis noticeboard.
This page is about apolitician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk ofbiased editing, talk-pagetrolling, and simplevandalism.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please seethis help page.
This article is ratedStart-class on Wikipedia'scontent assessment scale.
It is of interest to the followingWikiProjects:
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofwomen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
WikiProject iconScotlandMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofScotland andScotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBiography:Politics and Government
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited tojoin the project andcontribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to thedocumentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported bythe politics and government work group.
WikiProject iconPolitics of the United KingdomMid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope ofWikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage ofPolitics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can jointhe discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
MidThis article has been rated asMid-importance on theproject's importance scale.

"mocked"

[edit]

REthis edit, I feel using "mocked" here to describe the reaction to her statement is unnecessarily negative and possibly unbalanced (after all, she had her supporters for her statement). As for the Rossshire Journal reference, I removed it to prevent cite overkill, though I've nae studied it to any great extent and it may have some use elsewhereCiphriusKane (talk)02:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CiphriusKane Yet you leave in the line "She wascelebrated by republican organisation Our Republic for taking her solemn affirmation under protest." (My emphasis)Kalamikid (talk)09:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kalamikid: I'd actually remove that as well for being regular dross, but I'd like to deal with one issue at a timeCiphriusKane (talk) 09:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC) EDIT: I've removed it as Our Republic are a new organisation from what I can seeCiphriusKane (talk)11:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just going to add that was actually the second timeKalamikid used the term "mocked" in reference to the tweet1CiphriusKane (talk)11:26, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I used the same phrase I used the first time, just with three references this time to show that she was mocked. I'm not going to loose any sleep over it. Thank you for removing the other 'claim'Kalamikid (talk)07:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And that shows ye fail to understand the issue. A rival MSP on Twitter and a bunch of Twitter trolls hardly justifies the wording, especially when written in such a way that implies the mockery was universal and ignores the support. It pushes an overly negative and biased toneCiphriusKane (talk)09:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Emma_Roddick&oldid=1257806068"
Categories:
Hidden category:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp